I see a few AX201 with different PCIID's

I'm looking to obtain a build of freebsd libc headers for every target. how might I accomplish this?

they all share some code

I'm aware

and I think libc is one of them so /usr/include/* should be what you need

there are per-arch generated files such as machine/_types.h

fetch the code and do a manually do it

manually do what?

dunno

read?

andrewrk: What is your actual usage for this " build of freebsd libc headers for every target" ??

Might help people help you

Erhard, I'm looking into adding support into the zig compiler for targeting freebsd libc when cross compiling

So could you not just git the source and compile it?

cd /usr/src ; vim Makefile

tell you how to do it hence my "read"

zig handles multiple languages and targets like clang or gcc ? I know nothing about it

YEah, basically, cpet

and there a reason why build systems are the arch to be built for

as cross compiling is kind of a pain

ziglang.org interesting... kind of

Title: Home ⚡ Zig Programming Language

Seems like every three or four years something great like that comes along. And rarely ever gets used.

Of course this could be different, especially if you contribute to it

POSIX has a common set of includes and the compile links to libc

so not really sure what he needs the includes for each arch

Erhard, so you are suggesting to perform the build on each architecture? or perhaps there is a handy way to cross compile FreeBSD for any target from the x86_64 host?

hrm told you how

I htink there is, but I no expert on cross compiling.

well that fixed that

But step one would be to get it working on x86 or whatever your platform of choice is.

nah that's baby stuff. I need a 13.1 build for every supported arch, and a 12.3 build for every supported arch

LOL. Then fire up some VMs

haha well that's the worst case scenario. I haven't given up there being a better way yet :)

Title: Makefile - src - FreeBSD source tree

# toolchains - Build a toolchain for all world and kernel targets.

seriosuly yo ?

Listen to cpet

like I said "read"

It should all be common from make, no?

we aren;t going to hold your hand to get yet another compiler to work if you cant do the bare minimum of getting headers for arch

thanks cpet. I haven't been ignoring your advice, just waiting for git: Resolving deltas: 78% (305096/387727)

Maybe switch everything to GNU autoconf while you are at it

autotools you only need 1 thing m4

mason and all the other perl python crtap you need a bnunch of py or p5

Yeah, I set a bunch of project up to use it years ago, actually pretty slick.

kind of defeats the purpose

I tried to port bitchx to cmake

:P

what I will do is completely ignore freebsd's build system, then hard code the logic in an imperative manner, just as I have already done for musl, mingw-w64, and glibc

LOL. I never really got cmake.

I mean, I guess I never used it much, and it was a headache because sometimes it was hard to install certain places.

cmake mason

think I tried to port a project that had 3 different compiling tools included

pick one and use it

I don't know which mason you are referring to.

openhub.net/p/mason ?

Title: The Mason Open Source Project on Open Hub

meson*

:)

Ah

Title: Meson - Open Source Agenda

Never tried it

New Old Stock

not everyone wants to deal with autotools

ugh the Makefile is not compatible with gnu make

No doubt. Not everyone wants to deal with python

well if you compare m4 to python :)

Toche

python is "easier"

touche even

YEah

M4 is horrid

but then again bsd make Makefiles are simple to read and understand

Handwritten makefiles work decently for smaller stuff

Though some system is nice to test for libs, etc.

when youre forced to use something

I hated git but now I can deal with it ;P

It's much nicer to see "libtwitter not found" than it is to get "tweet() undeclared in this context. compilation failed"

Yeah, I still am no git master.

Was pretty decent with cvs

I don't code enough to need and RCS at this point. Kinda wish I did, but not my main thing anymore

andrewrk: are you trying to build the base system or just need the headers? if latter, then you could just pull base.txz from e.g. download.freebsd.org/releases/amd64/12.3-RELEASE and get /usr/include from it

Title: Index of /releases/amd64/12.3-RELEASE/

dmgk, aha, thank you! I tried doing that with download.freebsd.org/releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1 but the images didn't have any .h files. where did you get that other link just now?

Title: Index of /releases/amd64/amd64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/

andrewrk: download.freebsd.org/releases has all supported archs

Title: Index of /releases/

thanks!

why does the powerpc one have a 13.1-RELEASE/ folder, but then also has subfolders, e.g. powerpc64/ that also have 13.1-RELEASE/ folders?

probably just symlinks

gotcha

morning

dmgk, hmm is there one for armv6 and armv7?

there are no releases for arm6 and arm7, but you could grab snapshot tarballs from the ci, like artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/12…8afa6bc45ab0885d083d6f9da2e6024/arm

Title: Index of /snapshot/12.3-STABLE/00d2b8d5d8afa6bc45ab0885d083d6f9da2e6024/arm/

this one seems to be the latest, artifact.ci.freebsd.org/snapshot/12…4ea08ee05c351d5bef035d/arm/?C=M&O=D

Title: Index of /snapshot/12.3-STABLE/6a9031c5e2ba5435aa4ea08ee05c351d5bef035d/arm/

thanks!

np

Hello friends

hi

using git in freebsd is a great idea. I don't know since when it is but that's very cool

git is gpl'd.

hi

anyone updated xrdp lately and have issues about it ?

Better would be just ask about the issue instead of who had the issue

ok :)

have this error on xrdp-sesman.log

There is no X server active on display 14

A fatal error has occurred attempting to start the window manager on display 14, aborting connection

how to use ip command instead of ifconfig | freebsd

you don't :)

ifconfig is the way and the light. i miss it when I have to use L*n*x.

Reinhilde > oh Thanks for answer

Hey ! I am trying to upgrade freebsd 13.1 to CURRENT. At the last step 'etcupdate -B' fails with 'Conflicts remain from previous update, aborting'

koobs, I've just upgrade freebsd to current it works now

I'd like to set a folder so that my local (samba) users could add files inside it, but not list contents of that folder. With that, I want to achieve everyone can put their files there but never see what's inside there.

Is this possible with chmod?

Reinhilde, I don't know if ti's a good thing, but git is easier to use

for freebsd it is not good

I guess I solved it now with chmod 733 foldername

so why git ?

there is no alternatives proposed in the guide. git is not used in the BSD code but as a tool so I am not sure there is incompatibilities with GPL, no ?

send ip sendto : no buffer space available > I have trouble in hping3 | vmware on freebsd 13 | do you have any solution suggestions?

???????

Reinhilde : I'm using hping on freebsd 13.1. but > I get the error send_ip sendto : no buffer space available.

I am trying to setup linuxulator but when I run debootstrap I get the following message using both doas under my account, or root: "/usr/local/sbin/debootstrap: Permission denied." I can't seem to figure out what the issue is. permissions on the file are fine.

Creating /compat/ubuntu doesn't help either

what could I be missing?

I am on 13.1-RELEASE-p2

I am reading some old comments online about encrypted drives. I am using ZFS with GELI on this laptop...

tercaL: write only should be possible with samba

anyone use BitlBee on Slackware 15+current and figured out if something needs fixing?

Slackware? Think you got the wrong channel there?

Midjak: lovely!