what's the standard for adding something new to illumos-gate? I just noticed freebsd took wireguard into base: github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/main/sys/dev/wg/if_wg.c

I know nshalman has been staying on top of wireguard-go: github.com/nshalman/wireguard-go

but theres been reluctance to merge upstream in WireGuard/wireguard-go #39 probably in no small part because zx2c4 doesn't know illumos, and basically wants signoff from tun driver in illumos

i'm coming to the conclusion that we should import resolveconf

(to manage resolv.conf when there are multiple sources of config for it..)

it'd also be nice to have something like /etc/resolvers on osx (where you can have different DNS servers based on the domain you're looking up)

[illumos-gate] 16156 zpool_create_016_pos does not tell why it failed -- Toomas Soome <tsoome⊙mc>

[illumos-gate] 16158 git-pbchk file checks should be done in filename order -- Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld⊙ho>

jclulow: Thanks for keeping Gerrit running. I just got some unexpected behavior: when I uploaded patch set 5 to code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3226 it cleared the +1 review from andyf despite the only change being to the commit message (added a Reviewed by, changed CommitDate). Have not seen that before.

→ CODE REVIEW 3226: 16143 git-pbchk should handle Change-Id in multi-commit workspaces (NEW) | illumos.org/issues/16143

jclulow: I should also say that patch set 5 was rebased on top of the submitted version of #16158 / code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3225)

→ CODE REVIEW 3225: 16158 git-pbchk file checks should be done in filename order (ABANDONED) | illumos.org/issues/16158

sommerfeld: A change to both the commit and a rebase is considered non-trivial.

It's not great, but that is known behavior of gerrit.

annoying. was trying to avoid creating too much noise.

If someone's not in the attention set, it won't generate any noise.

(but yes that failure is annoying)

[illumos-gate] 16153 ZFS checkpoint tests need to cleanup better -- Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheimd⊙gc>

sommerfeld: Yeah sorry about that. If you do just the rebase and there are no conflicts, and push that, then you can do the commit message change in a second amend-and-push

What's the state of Intel graphics support in Illumos? I've got a workstation here with Intel Kabylake (Xeon E3-1245 v6) and graphics are.. slow. Is there something I'm missing?

Is there a way to see what graphics driver the current display is using, and if there's 3D acceleration?

I found this page: docs.openindiana.org/dev/graphics-stack/#sna

But it isn't clear to me if that indicates 3D support in current Illumos-gate, as it includes some of the most recent Intel chipsets like Cannonlake