01:29:46 <josephholsten> what's the standard for adding something new to illumos-gate? I just noticed freebsd took wireguard into base: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/blob/main/sys/dev/wg/if_wg.c
01:31:03 <josephholsten> I know nshalman has been staying on top of wireguard-go: https://github.com/nshalman/wireguard-go
01:35:25 <josephholsten> but theres been reluctance to merge upstream in https://github.com/WireGuard/wireguard-go/pull/39 probably in no small part because zx2c4 doesn't know illumos, and basically wants signoff from tun driver in illumos
02:20:33 <sommerfeld> i'm coming to the conclusion that we should import resolveconf
02:20:49 <sommerfeld> (to manage resolv.conf when there are multiple sources of config for it..)
04:04:34 <jbk> it'd also be nice to have something like /etc/resolvers on osx (where you can have different DNS servers based on the domain you're looking up)
09:51:02 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 16156 zpool_create_016_pos does not tell why it failed -- Toomas Soome <tsoome⊙mc>
16:44:58 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 16158 git-pbchk file checks should be done in filename order -- Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld⊙ho>
16:56:08 <sommerfeld> jclulow: Thanks for keeping Gerrit running.  I just got some unexpected behavior: when I uploaded patch set 5 to https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3226 it cleared the +1 review from andyf despite the only change being to the commit message (added a Reviewed by, changed CommitDate).   Have not seen that before.
16:56:09 <fenix> → CODE REVIEW 3226: 16143 git-pbchk should handle Change-Id in multi-commit workspaces (NEW) | https://www.illumos.org/issues/16143
16:59:55 <sommerfeld> jclulow: I should also say that patch set 5 was rebased on top of the submitted version of #16158 / https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3225)
16:59:56 <fenix> → CODE REVIEW 3225: 16158 git-pbchk file checks should be done in filename order (ABANDONED) | https://www.illumos.org/issues/16158
17:38:11 <rmustacc> sommerfeld: A change to both the commit and a rebase is considered non-trivial.
17:39:11 <rmustacc> It's not great, but that is known behavior of gerrit.
17:44:14 <sommerfeld> annoying.   was trying to avoid creating too much noise.
17:55:48 <rmustacc> If someone's not in the attention set, it won't generate any noise.
17:55:58 <rmustacc> (but yes that failure is annoying)
20:45:04 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 16153 ZFS checkpoint tests need to cleanup better -- Serapheim Dimitropoulos <serapheimd⊙gc>
22:00:03 <jclulow> sommerfeld: Yeah sorry about that.  If you do just the rebase and there are no conflicts, and push that, then you can do the commit message change in a second amend-and-push
22:50:46 <duncan> What's the state of Intel graphics support in Illumos? I've got a workstation here with Intel Kabylake (Xeon E3-1245 v6) and graphics are.. slow. Is there something I'm missing?
22:51:02 <duncan> Is there a way to see what graphics driver the current display is using, and if there's 3D acceleration?
22:52:07 <duncan> I found this page: https://docs.openindiana.org/dev/graphics-stack/#sna
22:52:47 <duncan> But it isn't clear to me if that indicates 3D support in current Illumos-gate, as it includes some of the most recent Intel chipsets like Cannonlake