I suppose although very useful, not many people generally need to interact with it regularly, unless you're trying to deal with hardware (or ppt, but that's also dealing with hardware)

So it might not make sense to tie it down to a comitted interface

I _might_ have seen this one illumos.org/issues/16060 with newer versions of rsync/rsyncd

→ BUG 16060: tcp data loss with recv() (New)

the connection mysteriously hangs

Hello all. Some people in freebsd claim that this issue with datacorruption in dmu_object_wait_synced() could also impact us. openzfs/zfs #15526 are people here aware of this?

havent heard about dmu_object_wait_synced()

toasterson: you have to port copy_range feature first :) illumos missed many openzfs features

Ah, good I wondered if it was counterflaming

igork, apparently there are more ways to trigger it openzfs/zfs #15526#issuecomment-1826412289

toasterson: i know :) i'm on this community list :)

@tsoome --> my mailer is whining about me not being able to send email to you. This is on my end, but I had some notes about your RTI for illumos#15791

(fenix illumos#15791 )

BUG 15791: screen: man page shows wrong quit (Resolved)

↳ illumos.org/issues/15791

Shit...

fenix illumos#15971

BUG 15971: smb_pathname_lookup could avoid some access checks (Pending RTI)

↳ illumos.org/issues/15971 | code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3079

THAT's better.

ANyway, it should be in the `advocates` archive.

danmcd the list did send it to me, thanks