10:38:29 I suppose although very useful, not many people generally need to interact with it regularly, unless you're trying to deal with hardware (or ppt, but that's also dealing with hardware) 10:38:41 So it might not make sense to tie it down to a comitted interface 17:02:40 I _might_ have seen this one https://www.illumos.org/issues/16060 with newer versions of rsync/rsyncd 17:02:41 → BUG 16060: tcp data loss with recv() (New) 17:02:56 the connection mysteriously hangs 18:23:31 Hello all. Some people in freebsd claim that this issue with datacorruption in dmu_object_wait_synced() could also impact us. https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15526 are people here aware of this? 18:31:31 havent heard about dmu_object_wait_synced() 18:58:24 toasterson: you have to port copy_range feature first :) illumos missed many openzfs features 18:59:19 Ah, good I wondered if it was counterflaming 19:05:21 igork, apparently there are more ways to trigger it https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/15526#issuecomment-1826412289 19:41:31 toasterson: i know :) i'm on this community list :) 20:36:15 @tsoome --> my mailer is whining about me not being able to send email to you. This is on my end, but I had some notes about your RTI for illumos#15791 20:36:30 (fenix illumos#15791 ) 20:36:31 BUG 15791: screen: man page shows wrong quit (Resolved) 20:36:31 ↳ https://www.illumos.org/issues/15791 20:36:38 Shit... 20:36:46 fenix illumos#15971 20:36:47 BUG 15971: smb_pathname_lookup could avoid some access checks (Pending RTI) 20:36:47 ↳ https://www.illumos.org/issues/15971 | https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3079 20:36:49 THAT's better. 20:37:07 ANyway, it should be in the `advocates` archive. 21:27:10 danmcd the list did send it to me, thanks