so who's going to write the nsswitch backend for GNS? lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2023-11/msg00003.html

I'm sorry what now

indeed, the what now

They learned from oxide...... Be Bold :P

Question is tho...... Did they implement it in rust ?

the GNU alternative to DNS of course

at least it looks like it maaaaybe can kinda fall back and doesn't overlap domains? (from a _very_ quick read)

so less problematic than say DNS over HTTPS

uugh.. probably tilting at windmills to expect a drive manufacture to actually follow the SCSI spec :)

I have a bridge here I can sell you...

How's it do with troubled waters?

it causes a PCI bus reset on contact with any form of water

DoH is a trashfire, so at least GNS understand that.

understands... uggh.

i feel calling it a trashfire is putting it mildly

and the people promoting it were ignorant at best, if not just disingenuous

I know one person whose opinion I respect who was (still is?) a DoH fan. I think he naively worried about the wrong threat environment (though regular DNS still has a nasty threat environment).

my issue is most of the justifications for it really aren't

if you issue a DoH lookup, and then within milliseconds connect to IPs registered to say cnn.com (or insert your website of choice here), I can make some pretty good guesses what your query was

(as one example)

then there's all the operational headaches

multiple sources of truth