16:41:11 <alanc> so who's going to write the nsswitch backend for GNS? https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2023-11/msg00003.html
19:06:24 <jclulow> I'm sorry what now
19:11:01 <sjorge> indeed, the what now
19:14:45 <Smithx10> They learned from oxide...... Be Bold :P 
19:15:23 <Smithx10> Question is tho...... Did they implement it in rust ? 
19:18:11 <alanc> the GNU alternative to DNS of course
19:28:17 <jbk> at least it looks like it maaaaybe can kinda fall back and doesn't overlap domains? (from a _very_ quick read)
19:28:27 <jbk> so less problematic than say DNS over HTTPS
19:42:14 <jbk> uugh.. probably tilting at windmills to expect a drive manufacture to actually follow the SCSI spec :)
20:19:13 <danmcd> I have a bridge here I can sell you...
21:21:09 <nomad> How's it do with troubled waters?
21:27:50 <alanc> it causes a PCI bus reset on contact with any form of water
21:34:59 <danmcd> DoH is a trashfire, so at least GNS understand that.
21:38:52 <danmcd> understands... uggh.
21:45:40 <sjorge> i feel calling it a trashfire is putting it mildly
21:57:03 <jbk> and the people promoting it were ignorant at best, if not just disingenuous
22:59:16 <danmcd> I know one person whose opinion I respect who was (still is?) a DoH fan.  I think he naively worried about the wrong threat environment (though regular DNS still has a nasty threat environment).
23:01:58 <jbk> my issue is most of the justifications for it really aren't
23:03:13 <jbk> if you issue a DoH lookup, and then within milliseconds connect to IPs registered to say cnn.com (or insert your website of choice here), I can make some pretty good guesses what your query was
23:03:17 <jbk> (as one example)
23:03:27 <jbk> then there's all the operational headaches
23:03:39 <jbk> multiple sources of truth