I use an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 with the nvidia-driver-470 over three screens. No issues.

what's the preferred EC curve for TLS keys nowadays? is secp384r1 still a reasonable choice?

luser: in my case the nvenc/dec would be the most important

for plex or jellyfin

luser: >2 screens on Kepler based cards inherently doesn't work right at the hardware level. it forces the bus speed to maximum regardless of load and has unfixable screen tearing

I hate it

I use 2 screens max with a GTX 660 and that driver

I don't have screen tearing.

It works great.

# zgrep -R 'Ns.*=' /usr/share/man/man5

zgrep: the -R flag is not currently supported

what a useless script

we really should too many greps, i wonder if anyone would care if we just deleted most of them and left grep, egrep, fgrep and zgrep

i wrote a thing (it's an acme client, because there aren't already enough of those): github.com/llfw/lfacme

Is it possible to run proxmox under bhyve?

it said something about not supporting nested virtualization

svragv, possible? Maybe. The real quesiton would be why?

CrtxReavr: So i can run proxmox on a server I have on freebsd.

I don't want to hear the philosophy behind running proxmox under bhyve i just want to know if it's possible

I mioght be able to sell proxmox vms to friends if it's possible

So you want to virtualize inside of virtualization?

yes

Are you going to run some cointainers inside that mess too?

Most likely.

svragv: bhyve doesn't support nested virtualisation and i don't believe that's a planned feature

ivy, wouldn't that only prevent bhyve in bhyve?

CrtxReavr: no

it would prevent anything trying to use virtualisation extensions inside bhyve

Not all virtualization requires those extensions though.

if you're talking about virtualisation as people do today, i.e. bhyve, kvm, the modern way to use xen, hyperv, etc then yes it does

xen has a mode which can do virtualisation without CPU extensions, but i'm not sure how well supported that is today

otherwise your only other option is emulation, which is different from virtualisation

(and much, much slower)

Well. . . I used way too much VMware, vbox, & Virtual Server, Et al. before CPUs had those extentions.

i'm not sure that any of those work today without vt-x/amd-v

but yeah, if you had purely software-based virtualisation approaches then you could technically do it

xen pv, for example, could be used i believe