hello anyone know why if I try read a wireshar capture file that come from openbsd I cannot read it ?

I mean I run tshark -w tcp.log on openbsd, then I move it on freebsd and I cannot read it. tshark on obsd is 4.0.7 and in fbsd is 4.0.6

Evening all

I'm having some ipfw problems, cause unknown. Can anyone give me a hint? I think I've capture everything here: bsd.to/VVXE

Title: dpaste/VVXE (Plain Text)

The machine is a KVM-based virtual machine with its public IP address on interface vtnet0 and a number of jails on 192.168 IPs with port redirects. My NAT rule at ipfw rule# 5001 seems to clobber all incoming traffic, Rule# 5000 is in place as a workaround, it's not part of the intended configuration. What am I doing wrong?

Hi, can I get some guidance on fixing my system? After upgrade and zfs upgrade, no longer booting. Something on boot screen about out of cache or something. I think the mbr bit needs upgraded or the bit on the tiny partition?

I'm booted from USB now

I don't get a boot menu when I try to boot normally

legacy boot or UEFI?

no idea. gpart show it's GPT not MBR if that helps? how do I check? this is a N54L micro server somewhat old predates USB3

is there a freebsd-boot partition, or an EFI partition, or both?

freebsd-boot 512k free 492k swap 2g freebsd-zfs 110G free 452k

and what version did you upgrade from and to?

ok, so that's legacy boot with GPT

13-2 something release? not sure sorry :( whatever made the scary messages about no more updates go away. I learned on FreeBSD 5 then I was a dirty linux user for 20 years

what version was it on before, and you upgraded how?

if you're booted from a 13.2 USB drive, you can update the bootcode using:

I honestly don't remember. I think it was 12 when I installed, then I did an upgrade to 13 that was fine, then recently upgraded to 13.2 or 13-2 maybe? I installed the system originally maybe 3 years ago

sorry the USB is 13.1-RELEASE

cd /boot; gpart bootcode -p gptzfsboot -i 1 ada0 # assuming ada0 is your boot disk, might be da0

the -i 1 is the index of the freebsd-boot partition

_don't_ get those wrong, you don't want to clobber your data

ok the /boot is going to be on the USB is that ok? boot disk is ada3

the usb's version of /boot/gptzfsboot should be ok, but if you want it to match the installed version, then you should be able to find that by importing the zpool and getting the /boot/gptzfsboot from there

gpart show ada3 the first listing is freebsd-boot

I have to go afk for a bit

oh the 3 column lists 1 2 3. just worried about a counting from 0 or 1 thing. OK, let me try to reboot now I guess

RhodiumToad: ahah, thank you sir! booting now which I assume will be successful

begs question why the upgrade dance didn't upgrade these bits

neat it's back on the network

wups, didn't realize I logged out. Did I miss any wisdom about my ipfw question?

gh00p: I for one didn't answer because you'd left :-)

gh00p: 05001 nat 1 ip4 from any to 198.23.196.224 in via vtnet0 -- what's that "198.23.196.224" represent?

RhodiumToad: laptop died. thanks again

da15p2 UNAVAIL 0 0 0 cannot open

that's odd... a disk dropped out and the hot spare didn't take over

well... guess zfsd wasn't turned on :/ guess that did the trick lol. wow that was a fail on my part

hm. is there something that needs to be added to rc.conf to get zfsd to start on boot? zfs_enable=YES is there .. i just assumed zfsd was part of that

Macer: it seems to have an rc script of its own? /etc/rc.d/zfsd with zfsd_enable in it

yuripv: ouch. might want to add that to the fbsd zfs section heh

i just happened to just type zfsd and it started up the daemon and it kicked off the resilver to the hot spare. it was just by chance that i noticed that too even though it's a raidz2 pool

I had archlinux last year and with qbittorrent created this hybrid version 1+2 torrent but I dont see this feature in qbittorent on freebsd..... anyone know why?

would guess the LIBTORRENT2 option is responsible for that "LIBTORRENT2=off: Version 2.x (experimental)" freshports.org/net-p2p/qbittorrent

Title: FreshPorts -- net-p2p/qbittorrent: Bittorrent client using Qt5 and libtorrent-rasterbar

you should be using v1 anyway as thats what most if not almost all clients expect

you can also create hyprid v1+v2 torrents as long as the clients support reading it and then it doesn't matter if the client only speaks v1 or only v2

correct but unless there is a push by a lot of clients for v2 and you are trying to maximize the view to all clients then whats the point

a client supporting v1 and v2 can seed in both versions

well yeah. but whats the point ? if v2 clients understand v1 then big deal

and we shouldn't have tried to migrate to ipv6 in 2000 because most users only had ipv4 back then?

completely diff issue. i don't think were running out of bittorrent space

ok, a recent example, we shouldn't adopt jpeg xl, because google chrome doesn't support it (yet?)

hybrid!!

so that freshport has hybrid and 2?

or no its disabled

ugh

oh oh I have to install the port myself and then pick on?

RhodiumToad: sorry about last night, I should really get a real irc client, rather than using web.libera.chat.

irssi client rocks goop

+1

gh00p: 05001 nat 1 ip4 from any to 198.23.196.224 in via vtnet0 -- what's that "198.23.196.224" represent?

i havent installed a port in years

RhodiumToad: that should have been $public.

concrete_houses: freshports is a site that provides information about the ports tree, for example which options a port has and what the defaults are

bsd.to/fOM8 is the new paste...

Title: dpaste/fOM8 (Plain Text)

ok so it does not have like pacakges that are non standard

I wish they had a pacakge with 2 and hybrid enabld and just called it liek qbittorrent-v2 or something

RhodiumToad, what I don't understand is why with that rule in place I can't even *ping* the host. It responds to nothing. I thought traffic that doesn't match nat rules would just pass through to the next ipfw rule.

gh00p: try it with in recv vtnet0 and out xmit vtnet0 rather than using "via"

(on rules 5001/5002)

"via" checks both interfaces on a routed packet, not just the in or out one

concrete_houses: that sort of thing can be done as a flavor, but usually it's only done when the port maintainer thinks there's a good enough reason for it

RhodiumToad, the change you suggest makes perfect sense to me, unlike the behaviour of "via". :)

yuripv: are you yuri@? where does the information, that libtorrent-rasterbar2 support in qbittorrent would be experimental come from? I can't find it anywhere

RhodiumToad, thank you -- I don't fully understand why it was broken, but at least it's working now.

gh00p: "in via vtnet0" matches if the packet arrived on another interface and was routed out through vtnet0

So was I taking the match traffic and just resubmitting it to the nat engine over and over again?

matched*

including for example if it arrived on an epair from a jail

nimaje: wrong yuri

this one is yuripv@

anyway, the moral of the story is that using "in via" or "out via" is almost always a mistake, and you should use "in recv" or "out xmit" unless you know exactly why you want "via"

Hello

well, yuri<tab> only gave me that one, so it was worth a try, concrete_houses you could ask via bugs.freebsd.org, if it is still correct that libtorrent-rasterbar2 support is experimental and suggest switching the default options

oh wth. my /script command in irssi is missing

nimaje: don't mistake that for any kind of judgement on getting the wrong one; your conclusion was generally reasonable

funny thing is it seems a few days ago or a week or so when joining a channel ... /names is not displayed

tho the /names command still works. anyone else see this ?

yeah, I wasn't and thanks for the info, without it I would have waited to get it from someone else, before suggesting a PR

CmdLnKid: did you compile irssi without perl support?

no sorry not a freebsd related issue as i just found out. same version two diff platform

was just curious if this was showing up elsewhere.

specfically its brew on mac that is having the problem confirmed by a fresh install of the same version on freebsd

ye, always better to use freebsd than mac

base system is similiar enough witha lot of polish on top. perfect medium for me !

its just costs me a lot more

shit that just reminded me for some reason... openvms just released a community license and i want to see if i can get that running under bhyve

still have to download it yet but hoping i can get a cluster going between virtualbox on macos and a bhyve

id love to recreate the old deathrow cluster on some more modern x86 base freebsd running hardware and other virtual solutions to experiment with

in ref for newer folks deathrow.vistech.net

CmdLnKid: does VMS on x86 even support any of the cluster features?

freebsd run ok on old mac laptops?

iceWM user here

I have a question. I have a 5-ish year old laptop. i7, combination i7 and nVidia Quadro 2000 GPU. I _think_ have experienced before where input to X was delayed until the next keyboard press --- so, say, an xterm would show the last character on a line typed when I hit enter, but not the result... until I hit enter again.

... but now this same behaviour is happening on the console (makes logging in challenging).

Nothing appears amiss when I interact with the laptop over wifi.

any ideas? FreeBSD-14-CURRENT as of earlier this week.

it happens on the console when nothing else is running, e.g. in single-user mode?

concrete_houses: how old?

meena, not sure, its still new but im hoping so

afair, and that's usually not very well, VMS made heavy use of the hardware it was running on. The VAX had very good support for just ripping pieces out and replacing them

I haven't tried single user mode. that's a thought.

... but it happens on console when X is not running.

I will try single user later when I can reboot it.

... so ... w.r.t. my post above, single user mode does not exhibit the typing problem. Console does even before X, and attaching a keyboard that has a transmit light (little keyboard that I use for varios things --- made by Rii) ... the transmit light can verify what is sent, but often, still... next keypress before it is reflected on the console.

zBeeble: are you using the drm drivers? if yes, try temporarily disabling those from loading and check if it still happens on console

hello I need help to get freebsd to recognize a usb wireless adapter

is there any way to get help to do this?

it doesn't see my device in ifconfig

does it see it in udbconfig, and does it see it in sysctl?

*usbconfig