-
pinetreeI read that the illumos Foundation is no longer
-
pinetreeThere's lots that can be ported to illumos from BSD's such as LLVM, NetBSD's make utilities, NetBSD's video drivers, FreeBSD's wifi drivers. FreeBSD used to have the best graphics drivers, and NetBSD was far behind, but NetBSD surpassed FreeBSD in video drivers, and no one realizes that.
-
alancthe illumos foundation never really did much, so it's hard to notice that it's gone
-
pinetreeIt was gone as of last year. They did hold the core together. BSD's have less common organization and more organizations and communities holding them together.
-
alancand yes, tons of possibilities, if people have interest and time to do that
-
pinetreeEverything needs a backing foundation though, even if it's not illumos
-
alancI don't think the foundation did anything to "hold the core together" - the development community did that on it's own
-
pinetreeI recently learned that SunOS was a BSD. When it became Solaris, it started having SysV.
-
alancmany open source projects do fine without a backing foundation
-
pinetreeThat's good
-
alancyep, early SunOS was forked from BSD 4.2, SunOS 4 (aka Solaris 1) started merging in some SysV components, and SunOS 5 (Solaris 2) was rebased on System V Release 4 (SVR4)
-
pinetreeThere were no books on illumos
-
nomadand was not well received in some quarters.
-
nomadit took *years* for Solaris 2 to get anywhere near as stable as SunOS 4.
-
nomadbut I'm not bitter about it. Nope. Not at all.
-
gitomat[illumos-gate] 17536 overflow checks ruined by int promotion -- Patrick Mooney <pmooney⊙pc>
-
danmcd
-
danmcd(I commented there's no mention of S10's AMD64 support with its FCS.)