FYI: Things with Gerrit ought to be better now. We were under attack from some putatively AI crawler spam bots

jclulow: thanks for fixing this!

Wow! Thanks for the diagnosis and cure. Fucking AI bots...

dumb question.. do we just completely disable the ability to omit frame pointers in our gcc, or is one of the -fno-XXXX-XXXX options implicitly including that -- -O implies -fomit-frame-pointer, so I'm guessing we must be doing something to undo that

but i'm not seeing the option for it

or i'm not seeing anything explicitly doing it

in our gcc 10, yes: illumos/gcc f924f65

ahh ok

our gcc 14 just got -fforce-omit-frame-pointer: illumos/gcc 6c5ac80

i'm trying to dig into an ntp problem, and the binary wasn't built with frame pointers annoyingly

but as best as I can tell, it appears to be running yyparse() in a signal handler...

which I really want to confirm

since that seems a somewhat insane thing to do

which NTP versioN?

jbk: clobbered gcc hard to make it never omit them, and then added an option to force it to (because building firmware)

the whole purpose being to make it hard for build systems to helpfully turn them off

yeah, i think this ntp got built with a different compiler binary...

i need to dig into that...

so if they're off by surprise for you, you'd probably want to try to work out how

yeah, :\

sommerfeld: 4.2.8P15

okay, the original, not one of the forks like ntpsec..

there's a long standing assert that gets tripped

it's been seen on illumos, but also on several linux distros as well

so I don't think it's anything we're doing wrong..

the fact that of the stack I can see, it appears to be in a signal handler

since I can see those bits from libc

and looking at all the callers... i just have to think i've missed something.., or there's more corruption that's makign things misleading...

My life has improved since switching to chrony haha

that's in the works..

[illumos-gate] 16006 Need RFC8106 decode in snoop -- Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld⊙ame>

is Gerrit slow for anyone else again? (did the AI spambots evade our blocks?)

seems quite ok

it made me log in again - after that it seems to be better. hmm.

It will make you log in again when network weather is bad

I do not understand why

or rather, it will ask you to. It will stop when the weather improves

I often reload when asked to login again.