'Rebooting' the OI illumos system on top of a Debian/testing KVM/qemu instance works reliable again now, for some time.

jclulow, jbk: just sent the RTI for illumos.org/issues/16163

→ BUG 16163: zfs scrub should pause scan when memory is low (In Progress) | code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3221

code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3221 shows a bunch of other changes touching dsl_scan that tsoome ported from openzfs but which I don't believe have integrated

→ CODE REVIEW 3221: 16163 zfs scrub should pause scan when memory is low (NEW) | illumos.org/issues/16163

yes, those are also waiting....

→ CODE REVIEW 2127: 14658 zfs: dsl_scan can block txg for arbitrary length of time (NEW) | illumos.org/issues/14658

→ CODE REVIEW 2201: 14760 Reduce ZIO io_lock contention on sorted scrub (NEW) | illumos.org/issues/14760

→ CODE REVIEW 2182: 14736 zfs: Improve sorted scan memory accounting (NEW) | illumos.org/issues/14736

(I have much too many things waiting... :)

any known blockers other than ENOTIME?

If I use bhyve on illumos, does it use the same stack as it uses with the Zones? aka will I get the same performance? Hell, even half of it is fine.

with bhyve's virtio-net and FreeBSD's if_bridge, I can squeez around 1.8Gbps, same with Jails. But I see that Zones get around 10Gbps (up to 20Gbps with a proper machine)

Or virtio-net will be my next blocker? :)

No, bhyve provides a hardware-virtual machine. So it won't be similar.

There is something called viona that works on top of that, but ultimately there is nothing get you out of virtio in the guest.

redmine slow for anyone else?

rmustacc I wonder if there's a way to get 10Gbps using virtio drivers on FreeBSD and then on illumos. Thanks for the answer, I'll dig more.

We have something called viona which tries to pass it more directly to a vnic.

[illumos-gate] 16219 sha2: input_len in SHA2Update should be 64 bit type -- Toomas Soome <tsoome⊙mc>

[illumos-gate] 16201 Panic after setting reference_tracking_enable -- Alexander Motin <mav⊙Fo>