-
fanta1are there plans to keep supporting qemu/kvm in illumos in the future or is it EOL for now?
-
jclulowfanta1: I'm not aware of any significant maintenance effort going into it. Bhyve has a lot of benefits and new work has all been in there.
-
jclulowIs there something you get from KVM that you can't from Bhyve?
-
jclulowI expect that SmartOS or maybe OmniOS folks will patch it if security issues are found, FWIW, but I'd encourage moving to Bhyve when you can
-
richloweI've been talking to hadfl about getting an updated qemu into omnios for a project, but probably separate from the kvm qemu
-
richloweI seem to recall there's years of gap and interface stuff and weirdness that probably nobody has time to deal with illumos-kvm for.
-
richlowebut if you were just wanting qemu, that might be coming
-
jclulowYeah, a QEMU for, say, emulating ARM or some other CPU, vs. a QEMU for accelerated x86 virtualisation, would be doable
-
richloweyes, that's basically what we'd been talking about
-
hadflyeah we got qemu 7.1.0 built. however, there are a few rough edges still that probably require patcing. the aim to add it is definitely to emulate different arch and not to replace the patched qemu for kvm
-
hadfl*patching
-
jclulowThere are also tools like qemu-img that are pretty useful outside of QEMU altogether
-
hadfliirc that's what solaris ships in their userland. just the tools but not the emulators
-
jclulowIt is somewhat unfortunate generally that qemu-img (where updates are often welcome, for new formats) is stapled to the QEMU emulator (where updates just always break something, and should be avoided if possible)
-
hadflprobably worth to build/ship the tools in a separate package then?
-
jclulowI suspect it might be yes!