Would like to have few eyes on code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/2374 please:)

→ CODE REVIEW 2374: 14993 zfs-tests: Move platform independent tests to a shared runfile (NEW) | illumos.org/issues/14993

jclulow or richlowe could you move illumos.org/issues/2271 to illumos-gate?

→ BUG 2271: CIFS clients fail to authenticate when idmap is using IDMU (New)

[illumos-gate] 15001 Unable to set smb property max_protocol to 3.1.1 or empty -- Gordon Ross <gwr⊙rc>

[illumos-gate] 14999 SMB server mis-handles very long file names -- Gordon Ross <gwr⊙rc>

[illumos-gate] 15007 zfs-tests: bootfs_006_pos is failing -- Toomas Soome <tsoome⊙mc>

tsoome: I have moved it and assigned it to you

Ah thanks, Matt Barden was asking for it but now he can handle it.

I'll assign it to Matt?

I guess so...

jbk: can't you just publish multiple TXT records? I though that's how it worked, but never really dig into mdns a whole lot, u just fire off multiple dns-sd commands and it works well enough

but will clients interpret that correctly?

or will the new one (for a host) replace the previous one?

i'm hardly an mDNS expert (I'm hoping maybe someone lurking is)

the rfc is not super clear at first glance

basically avoid large things I guess

lets see if 6763 has more info

that the service discovery specific one

skimming over it now

that looks like a new, just one record

rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6763#section-6.2 and a rather smallish recommend size at that, it also seems highly MTU dependent

danm it

6.8 does say you can have multiple in some cases

[illumos-gate] 14963 bhyve destroy should be more robust -- Patrick Mooney <pmooney⊙pc>

i tried to build illumos-gate on older system that does not have O_DIRECTORY, and it failed in find_elf; the fix is easy, but i'm not sure if i should file an issue as it's the native tool or should just leave it as is as O_DIRECTORY support was integrated more than 2 years ago

sorry.. that's my fault..

I was I guess trying to be overly cautious and didn't realize O_DIRECTORY was that new

(for us)

i can't call it new, it's from jan 2020 :)

i don't know if we really have a target for the 'oldest' we expect to be able to build from

but i'd be happy to review a change to make it work with older systems (or I can throw one up if you'd like since it was my fault)

i have it ready, just not sure if it's worth "fixing"

i mean we can just define it to '0' if it doesn't exist, or add an fstat(2) call to verify

well i guess if it's not a _huge_ effort just to keep things easier for people..

ok, illumos.org/issues/15016

→ BUG 15016: find_elf should cope with O_DIRECTORY absence (New)