after this long break.. this nfs is getting more odd.. so some how setting the mapping to a specific user name / group on the server, the client is linking to something else

Title: dpaste/hR5b (Plain Text)

i do not understand how focing a sharenfs mount to one user, would "change" on a client

disregard above, if anyone sees, aligned UID / GID between client and server.. relogin to client, remount and all fixed

My swap is full and `top` is telling me I have most of my memory allocated to "Laudry". What is that?

Sorry, "Laundry"

no idea but I'm going to say it's related to chromium/electron :P

ghoti: klarasystems.com/articles/exploring-swap-on-freebsd give this ya read see if it helps

Title: Exploring Swap on FreeBSD | Klara Inc

I do seem to have more "cron -s" processes than normal in the process list (1200 of them), but not enough to use up memory.

entikan: alas, not a workstation, no X.'

meena: okay, so perhaps my laundry queue is not being cleared. That would be a kernel function. What do you suppose could be the problem?

"Mem: 17M Active, 8192B Inact, 112G Laundry, 9116M Wired, 1434M Free"

ghoti: i wouldn't know without actually looking at the system. you mentioned cron running a lot of instances. what are they doing?

I am reading about the termios (not the most trendy thing), I can see that there are some flags in the struct termios defined in POSIX and not defined in FreeBSD 13, does anyone know where the FLAGs are defined? (in which .h) And why are some flags from POSIX.1 not defined? Thanks

Hi all, say, is it posslible to dl_open and .so file that resides on a noexec mounted partition?

s/posslible/possible/

s/and/an/

hi! what is better for zpool with 3 disks - raidz1 or draid1:2d:3c:0s?

hi all

hi adilix

VVD: that looks… weird

meena, why?

I don't know

:-D

I finally made the switch from xorg and dwm to wayland and hikari. i have to retrain my muscle memory, butt all in all it works nicely :)

s/butt/but/

VVD: three-way mirror

Anyone else seeing "fetch: ietf.org/timezones/data/leap-seconds.list: Not Found" in their periodic daily run outputs under "Checking for rejected mail hosts:"?

I can disable it from /etc/defaults/periodic.conf but I'm afraid I'll forget to re-enable it later.

mason, good joke! :-o

VVD: Not at all. If you have three disks, it's the only safe option.

ek, me too

mason, and good choice for waste space

Hey, it's your data. Have at it.

lol

I have 2nd copy on other server

and original data on production server

lol, you're all set then

It's 2nd backup server.

VVD: draids advantage is that it has much faster resilver, the (big) downside is that it's records are fixed instead of variable.

Much faster resilver in the context of very very wide arrays.

AllanJude: I made you a very simple PR: allanjude/uclcmd #29

Title: Fix file permissions by igalic · Pull Request #29 · allanjude/uclcmd · GitHub

old mess from my environment

thanks

Could these be in src/tools/tools?

ah, devel/uclcmd

debdrup: I would like to clean it up enough to just include it in base, but the code reads like I wrote it

(no offense, AllanJude)

it was the first thing I ever wrote in c

so no offense taken

The first thing I wrote in C outside of school was a file shoveller for/from Tibco message queues.

(because the Java people didn't believe that they could do it in Java)

That was a long time ago.

debdrup, I know that. But anyway I have choice. And I pick draid - my "small" tests show draid1 is faster than raidz1 for several %.

I did tests several times and on different disks with same zfs raid configuration.

draid is much worse at small blocks though

since it always uses a full stripe

the records (logical) work the same way

but the physical writes are aligned differently, to allow that faster resilvering

I saw a tool the other day on github that visualizes how dRAID lays out data on your disks. Looked pretty cool.

i am reading up on dns services, for local network, and it keeps pointing me to unbound but once in a while it is dnsmasq.. am i correct in thinking they perform the same basic function but there are differences for services? My object is to be able to do name resolution locally and potential side-effect computers use a "cache" copy of dns records to reduce hops to ISP