14:09:04 <arai> Hey guys, I'm looking at starting a project and I'm curious if there's any reason to not use CDDL-1.1?
14:25:37 <nahamu> arai: yes, one moment.
14:26:58 <nahamu> I think you'd probably be better off with something like MPL-2.0 based one what I've seen used by various projects in the illumos orbit.
14:28:05 <nahamu> I think CDDL was based on MPL 1.x and that MPL-2.0 also addresses many of the same issues but it more widespread and recognized.
14:28:17 <nahamu> *but is more widespread
14:29:35 <arai> "more widespread and recognized" I'm okay with being niche in that regard.
14:30:12 <nahamu> If you look at the oxidecomputer repos I think you'll see a lot of MPL-2.0
14:30:15 <andyf> All new contributions to illumos are CDDL 1.0 (and not 1.1), and there is presumably a reason. I can't find anything in the IRC history though.
14:31:52 <arai> I'm digging through the tritondatacenter repos as well and noticing a mix of MPL-2.0 and MIT
14:32:33 <andyf> It could just be that the initial licence steward for CDDL 1.1 is Oracle, versus Sun for 1.0.
14:34:35 <andyf> Or the changes around the litigation clause
14:38:02 <arai> Thanks for the feedback
14:38:11 <arai> I'm learning towards MPL-2.0