12:17:19 Yeah that works. mTLS or Basic Auth 18:28:49 So I was still unable to get communication working between the FAR GZ and NEAR GZ. Here is a network-map sketch: https://paste.omnios.org/?555253e8bd92fa3d#9Dnuhk2Y7HVbodwtZiPGMfaJvg9hGVXRYBERZiDSKtSP 18:38:10 here is some additional info: https://paste.omnios.org/?67df501c2b9775cb#HewyjBWdopynVceenBJ8T7xsy4qj7wfLZHS4fUBYMBtw 18:42:10 I can SSH from any NGZ to the other side's NGZ. I can SSH from any side NGZ to the other side GZ. However I can't SSH from any GZ to the other GZ. 18:44:49 Just for info: I also can't call the other NGZ from the opposite GZ 18:45:10 I would greatly appreciate any help. 18:46:17 I believe the culprit is the routing table at both side GZ-NGZ boundary 18:46:34 Let me know if you need any additional info 19:26:55 I'm wondering about why you're using addresses in the 100.64/10 range for your tun interface - that seems a little odd. 19:33:51 I don't think you need IPv4 routing enabled in the FAR-NGZ (only Forwarding) 19:35:13 I think you're missing the route for the FAR subnet (10.0.0.0/24) in the Near-GZ routing table. 19:35:35 (unless you've also got some internal NAT going on) 19:36:17 again I don't think you need IP4 Routing in the Near-NGZ (just Forwarding) 19:40:50 it might be useful to use the -n flag on netstat as well (netstat -nr) so we get numeric networks rather than names 19:44:43 I'm also wondering if you've got any required nat rules (incomming port maps) in place to make the VPN work properly (far end router and near-gz) 19:52:09 m1ari: 100.64/10 is tailscale-specific thing 20:04:37 here is the improved info collection: https://paste.omnios.org/?449ecdc66d4c339e#3BtgkbCrVvHkepsNfKJ6r5PpVvhCN7HsnAe9aArowznh