04:03:30 Do we support the Chelsio T7 now? 04:19:53 Got a wonderful message from SM: "Chelsio just informed us today that the requested T62100-LP-CR is going EOL" 12:45:37 rzezeski: I see this branch, https://github.com/oxidecomputer/illumos-gate/commits/ry/stlouis-t7/ Do you know what the state of the T7 is on illumos? 13:53:51 Smithx10: I have a version of the cxgbe driver that runs against an older version of the T7. The work was put on the back-burner for various reasons. There will be T7 support at some point, but the update to cxgbe is not yet in gate. 13:56:36 Think they said we won't be able to buy at T6 after 9/24/2026 13:57:21 So just to confirm, at the moment If I put a T7 card in.... that th@ng aint' tx'ing or rx'ing nothing :P 13:57:30 *naddddda* 13:58:02 correct 15:07:12 Sorry jbk but I'm obligated to ask.. how's the ice driver coming along? 15:19:39 nothing new to report really.. 15:19:54 we had several other emergencies, so hadn't been able to do much work the past couple of weeks... 15:21:01 and we're also moving our lab, so been waiting for the dust to settle from that before picking it back up 15:25:21 i've not tried this (so caveat operator(?)) but supposedly ice can work at least to some degree as an i40e NIC... unfortunately with the ever-decreasing quality of intel's documentation, it's not clear to what degree 15:25:41 e.g. if you could bind the i40e driver to instances 15:26:02 (my suspicion is that the compatibility doesn't go _that_ far and that it'll fail and/or panic the system, but don't really know) 15:47:25 I think I'll skip that experiment :) 18:05:30 I don't see how you can make i40e and ice work as the same device. While they have similar I/O engine constraints, the rest of the firmware interface is entirely different. 18:14:42 there was something buried in the manual.. it might just be for the VF stuff, I can't remember now 18:15:06 (which if so, probably doesn't help much since we don't really use that) 19:39:45 has anyone ran the dtrace test suite recently, and/or would I expect to see failures that are unrelated to a change I'm making? 19:44:47 jperkin: this was quite a while ago, maybe a year or more, but I think there we certain network related tests where I ran into failures because certain assumptions were made around the local network 19:44:51 I think I filed issues too 19:49:07 rzezeski: thanks, the failures don't appear to be related but just wanted to check I wasn't holding it wrong 19:59:04 there are tests that depend on network weather, and some that depend silently on some other stuff 19:59:11 I think maybe the NFS things assume you have some? 19:59:54 danmcd: is dtest in your release script? 20:15:42 It is not. 20:15:48 (At least not yet?) 20:16:04 ah, shame, thought it might give jperkin an easy baseline 20:45:36 [illumos-gate] 18195 Convert mpstat(8) to mdoc(7) -- Andy Fiddaman