03:52:57 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 17335 remove duplicate bool definition from Intel NIC drivers -- Robert Mustacchi <rm⊙fo>
07:46:26 <sjorge> Some of the early stlouis commit messages by wesolows channel how I write some of them at work e.g. https://github.com/illumos/illumos-gate/commit/35176f7353546ae71c226f5e1bea8fe74b72a817
07:46:26 <fenix> → GitHub commit 35176f7: HPET sync (how the hell did I miss this file?) (committed)
07:46:27 <sjorge> They are fun to go over when bored (stuck sick at home atm)
07:46:38 <sjorge> wait did I grab the wrong one?
07:47:07 <sjorge> Interesting fenix could grab it as it's not part of vanilla gate
07:54:22 <jclulow> I think GitHub leaks commits from forks sometimes
08:18:40 <szilard> Would a card like this work with Illumos? https://www.fujitsu.com/global/products/computing/servers/primergy/components/pmod-157814.html
08:19:27 <szilard> It uses a LSI SAS3008 control chip. I plan to use it in IT mode.
08:23:51 <tsoome_> if it is identifying itself as  PCI 1000:0097 then apparently mpt_sas driver should work (mpt_sas "pciex1000,97" from /etc/driver_aliases)
08:39:10 <szilard> Illumos hcl lists LSI SAS 3008 as supported device: 1000,97 and 1000,5f
10:35:13 <sjorge> https://gist.github.com/sjorge/ba979652938fc30b3b26630707dfdfba this one is built in on my mobo but it works well
10:54:27 <sjorge> and could be yeah, the oxide one is a fork from the vanilla one so it probably has some references in there from shared commits and somehow is able to link it up 🤔
10:54:32 <sjorge> git be weird sometimes
10:54:57 <sjorge> Hmm now i wonder if you can leak commits from a private repo that was forked from a public one
17:46:59 <andyf> sjorge - I'm pretty sure you can't fork a public repo into a private one.
19:08:55 <richlowe> that matches my memory too
19:09:26 <richlowe> all repos on github are sort of shared and all references sort of land there
19:09:54 <richlowe> so you can request your object on someone elses repo, I seem to recall mjg59 playing games with this to try to convince github it was obviously bad
19:10:27 <jbk> isn't that one of their 'tricks' is that it's I guess in effect 'dedup'ing all the various forks?
20:31:52 <sjorge> I suppose technically all commits on a fork somehow also end up on the tree... although it might be a dead end branch or a branch that got chopped off and is on the ground