06:01:40 <lactose> How do you pronounce illumos?
06:42:48 <jclulow> lactose: ih-loo-moes
06:42:59 <jclulow> or there-abouts
06:46:24 <ik5pvx> like illum-ination, no?
12:06:40 <veg> out of curiosity, has there been an influx of curiosity and possibly adoption of Illumos distros as a result of 0xide's endorsement of the project?
14:51:13 <lactose> veg: As for me, I first heard about illumos from a friend that was trying to run Solaris; she eventually got fed up with it and switched to OpenIndiana
14:57:19 <danmcd> veg: We have always been here, but Oxide using illumos-as-hypervisor (a further evolution of the SmartOS philosophy, with full HW control to make some problems more manageable) has not hurt us for sure.  :)
14:57:37 <danmcd> We're a pretty welcoming bunch, I hope.
16:06:32 <ik5pvx> pardon but who/what is oxide?
16:06:59 <ptribble> https://oxide.computer/
16:07:06 <ik5pvx> thanks!
20:20:44 <jbk> i've never thought about this, but is there any issue with obtaining two different DMA handles to the same address with ddi_dma_addr_bind_handle() (assuming obviously caller is coordinating/arbitrating appropriately) ?
20:28:06 <richlowe> that's a big assumption
20:28:42 <richlowe> I want to say "Not at the moment", but I'm not certain, and I would want to talk to someone who knew the iommu architecture to know if it would be true if that worked
20:29:20 <richlowe> by "iommu architecture" I mean "of the platform, etc" not so much the rather worrying code we have, but don't use
20:30:49 <rmustacc> I would probably put it under the could easily be problematic and better to avoid if you can.
20:31:19 <richlowe> yeah, that's what I was trying to say by "big assumption"
20:31:20 <rmustacc> In particular, if you have DDI_DMA_PARTIAL it's definitely not safe at any speed.
20:31:44 <rmustacc> You definitely can't get windows and other things.
20:31:49 <rmustacc> It seems better to share the handle than to make two.
20:43:26 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 17316 The strtok_r(9F) manual is missing -- Peter Tribble <peter.tribble⊙gc>
20:44:51 <richlowe> ptribble: thanks so much for all your manual labours
20:45:49 <ptribble> Thanks!
20:46:04 <ptribble> At some point I might get to fixing code.
20:46:09 <ptribble> Be afraid....
20:48:42 <nomad> What if I want to be just slightly concerned?
22:58:03 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 17282 express mac_sw_cksum() in terms of MEOI -- Patrick Mooney <pmooney⊙pc>