00:04:23 <rmustacc> richlowe: what about it?
00:14:02 <richlowe> whether there's a difference between _V0 (no FMA support possible) and _V1 if you don't use the FMA support
00:27:01 <rmustacc> richlowe: In general, I recommend folks today use V1 explicitly and say that they don't use the support.
00:27:25 <richlowe> that's what I was leaning toward, the code in pci_config_setup left me wondering if there were differences.  Thanks
00:28:52 <rmustacc> My read is that V0 is the same as specifying attr_access as DDI_DEFAULT_ACC.
00:29:48 <rmustacc> As part of things like impl_acc_err_init().
01:15:14 <Guest7> Is the illumos site down?
01:16:30 <dangergrrl> i get the homepage, Guest7 
01:20:48 <Guest7> Not sure what's going on, I've been getting 504 Gateway Time-out for the past week while trying to get to the man pages
07:25:23 <sjorge> pmooney so something else broke it, I guess not many people are using e1000 as I only confirmed it because of a ML post and nobody else seems to have responded to that post at all.
08:40:21 <toasterson> I marked two Bugs as SPAM as they contain advertisement. Who can delete them? jclulow ?
08:53:49 <jclulow> I'm aware of the spam stuff.  I will look into it tomorrow.
09:58:18 <Ellenor> ? :o
11:27:39 <andyf> sjorge - I can't replicate it here so I'm not sure what's going on yet.
11:31:58 <andyf> Are you running the bits from the pending sync (16890 fenix)?
11:32:08 <andyf> illumos 16890 fenix
11:32:09 <fenix> FEATURE 16890:  bhyve upstream sync 2024 November (In Progress)
11:32:09 <fenix> ↳ https://www.illumos.org/issues/16890 | https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/3809
17:03:08 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 17200 bootrd: need a bit of cleanup -- Toomas Soome <tsoome⊙mc>
19:58:53 <alanc> I've mailed Peter already, but for anyone else who wants to fix nits in the illumos man pages, the second part of https://pastebin.com/srs6urMx has a list for you
20:03:41 <richlowe> "wants to" is so easier than "can find time" 
21:02:21 <richlowe> I don't know why `prtconf -c` is not `prtconf -r` or `prtconf -R`, but eugh
21:08:27 <andyf> I suppose to go along with -a ..
21:08:47 <andyf> and d for descendents is taken..
21:17:09 <richlowe> -d was taken long after
21:17:27 <richlowe> but I guess the opposite, and -a couldn't be -p
21:17:31 <richlowe> it still annoys me
21:39:32 <richlowe> Also, I keep forgetting that time passes:  What turns out to be a long time ago now, someone said that pcmcia/cardbus was, in some way, still alive.  Is that still true?
21:40:03 <richlowe> specifically in the pcic(4D)/cardbus(5) sense
21:40:41 <tsoome_> someone used to run some router based on it if my memory serves...
21:42:26 <pmooney> seems unlikely now (Re: pcmcia)