01:16:05 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 9633 cxgbe should not reinvent the bool -- Patrick Mooney <pmooney⊙pc>
09:34:48 <tsoome_> sigh. # prctl -n zone.cpu-shares -v 10 -r -i zone omni
09:34:48 <tsoome_> prctl: omni: No controllable process found in task, project, or zone.
09:44:34 <tsoome_> prctl -i zone omni has quite normal and expected output, however...
09:47:47 <tsoome_> and unfortunately,  FSS has no effect on bhyve zone.
18:19:47 <jclulow> tsoome_: As I recall, prctl tries to find a representative process in the zone, which is usually init, but the bhyve brand is a bit wonky (in that it doesn't include the usual tree of processes)
18:20:12 <jclulow> We probably shouldn't be using the agent LWP to effect prctl actions
18:21:10 <jclulow> I wonder if it's also a privileges thing
18:21:22 <jclulow> (not sure what cred the agent operates with...)
20:27:51 <tsoome_> hm, thats unfortunate, but if it is really looking for init, then it explains the prctl error.
20:28:48 <tsoome_> I havent checked the prctl source (yet?)
20:51:04 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 17002 want wcslcat(3C) and wcslcpy(3C) -- Robert Mustacchi <rm⊙fo>
20:51:04 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 17003 fix wcsdup(3C) synopsis -- Robert Mustacchi <rm⊙fo>
21:16:26 <richlowe> since I suspect we might be one of the few people who use it, since AT&T sucked for so long, do we happen to have a potted document for "how to use cscope and be happy"?
21:30:20 <andyf> jclulow, tsoome_ - is is a privileges thing. In a bhyve zone (at least on OmniOS), bhyve is the zone's init process and it has very limited privileges. In particular it does not have PRIV_SYS_RESOURCE which prctl needs its victim/helper to have.
21:30:44 <richlowe> makes sense
21:31:27 <andyf> You can still set shares via zonecfg, I just don't know how effective they are.
21:44:04 <tsoome_> they are not effective at all with bhyve zone
22:06:22 <jclulow> Is that because most of the CPU usage is system time, and FSS doesn't apply there?
22:06:34 <jclulow> (obviously it should!)
22:11:23 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 17037 PCI headers missing dependencies -- Robert Mustacchi <rm⊙fo>
22:23:43 <andyf> I've just never validated it.
22:25:04 <richlowe> I can see reasons it would probably not be great