06:27:19 <tsoome> ya, fortunately fusion has gdb stub and we can inspect the machine:)
15:14:19 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 16820 Ignore library/libxml2/32 during package lint -- Marcel Telka <marcel⊙ts>
15:58:56 <Posterdati> ho
16:59:14 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 16670 libshare: issubdir() error: strcpy() 'dir1' too large for 'childdir' -- Toomas Soome <tsoome⊙mc>
18:46:40 <richlowe> tsoome_: if you're using source debugging that way, have you seen arm64-gate's .gdbinit?
18:47:13 <richlowe> it's not perfect (we don't have a way to find the .bss again for it, and it doesn't care about alignment), but it works like, many times out of 10
18:47:29 <richlowe> unfortunately, the one time it doesn't will really confuse you :\
18:49:44 <richlowe> anyway, that's what I did before I ported kmdb, and now I often use both at the same time (because I ported kmdb and don't trust it fully yet)
19:39:57 <tsoome_> I usually do not use source debugging with gdb stub, I have done this just few times:) but it is good to know, thanks
19:57:28 <richlowe> tsoome_: you're gonna hate and/or love https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3356.htm
20:06:34 <tsoome_> well, as it correctly stated, if we can declare variable in for statement, then why stop there -- it does make sense
20:10:46 <richlowe> I was just remembering how you dislike if ((foo = bar()) == NULL)
20:11:04 <richlowe> which isn't that different from if (foo = bar; foo != NULL)
20:11:17 <richlowe> which seems allowed here regardless of whether the LHS is a declaration
20:11:41 <richlowe> when I say "isn't that different", you're meant to ignore I reversed the condition like an absolute crumpet
20:12:18 <tsoome_> well, I still dislike excessive use of assignment statement in if:D  but if you add variable declaration to it, that is different;)
20:24:06 <andyf> I could grow to like that. I'm always trying to scope things down as tightly as possible.
20:32:00 <jclulow> My preference for assignment in if is definitely at odds with my preference for scope minimisation in C haha
20:32:06 <jclulow> Hard to reconcile sometimes
20:38:31 <richlowe> I just dont like _statements_, really.
21:23:49 <alanc> I certainly like (declaration; value check) better than combining them into a single ((foo = bar()) == NULL) style combo value-setting+check