11:55:03 richlowe: I don't check IRC as often as I used to. Tailscale seems generally status quo. I do rebases as they release new stuff, but I haven't done any real work in it otherwise. 11:56:19 Also I often forget to post an announcements and since I just use the binaries I've been bad about maintaining the packages, but my fork gets pretty regular tags and corresponding binary releases. 11:57:29 https://github.com/nshalman/tailscale/releases is the place to check. 18:41:49 fwiw I have been pulling those releases and everything seems to function properly 19:52:33 hm... sata disks... 642M repaired, 56,97% done, 0 days 02:22:27 to go 19:55:23 sata or ata? 19:56:13 sata 19:56:54 our ATA driver is painfully slow (which is why anyone using gen 1 hyperv VMs might have thought they were running off tape :P) 19:57:03 WDC-WD4004FZWX and HGST-HUS726T4TALA6L4 19:57:21 wonder if it's maybe the model 19:58:04 (drive model) 19:58:14 my HGST drives i don't think are that slow resilvering 19:58:45 and *knock on wood* have been pretty error free 19:59:16 which is more than i can say of a certain model of SAS drives 19:59:24 this supermicro X10SAE is pretty old 20:05:08 though speaking of that, i'll hopefully have some sata improvements up for review soon.. 20:05:31 trying to test those, hit a different bug that made it harder to test :) 20:08:39 :D 20:11:31 resilver/scrub speed depends a lot on the "shape" of data in the pool. Lots of tiny files vs. big sequentially written files. 20:26:48 thats true, of course. 21:08:23 an omnios used filed #16590 (fenix) which seems intriguing, if you're networky 21:08:24 BUG 16590: speed difference between IPv4 & IPv6 on 10Gbit connections (New) 21:08:25 ↳ https://www.illumos.org/issues/16590 21:10:06 uh. ouch. 21:12:47 I'm happy to provide additional data/tests as directed. 21:23:37 sommerfeld: I feel like at least with the sequential resilvering stuff that's less of an issue these days