11:19:40 <Agnar> is there a way to get the actual ashift value of a zpool? zpool get ashift rpool reports 0, but I assume it should be 12
11:22:10 <Agnar> ah, mdb -k and ::spa_config
11:22:18 <Agnar> so it's 9
11:26:32 <PMT> zdb -C also will tell you.
11:27:21 <Agnar> ah right
11:27:26 <Agnar> thanks!
11:46:16 <Agnar> tsoome: I hope you received my mail. I forgot to mention that I tried it in this case with driver/graphics/nvidia-390 - but the error is similiar on all other versions.
14:37:47 <Agnar> seems not to be my week. mirrored new nvme ssd's to my rpool, removed the sata ssd, rebooted and now I can't boot. I booted from an OI install stick and ran bootadm install-bootload -R rpool, but still nothing. sigh.
14:48:48 <denk> Agnar: happy new bug
14:49:58 <Agnar> yeah, even from load command line, chain on any lsdev doesn't work: "error while reading the file"
15:10:15 <Agnar> the question is: can I make the sata ssd that I detached from the pool make an rpool again without loosing the data:
15:10:19 <Agnar> ?
15:17:56 <Agnar> I'll try later to import the rpool via boot stick, mirror the sata ssd to it and then try to boot from the sata again.
15:18:08 <danmcd> Did you detach?  Or did you "zpool split"?
15:18:18 <Agnar> detach unfortunately
15:18:30 <danmcd> If you detached (like from a mirror) I don't know the difficulty in bringing it back.
15:18:45 <danmcd> (it's been a while, and I always use `zpool split`)
15:19:27 <Agnar> I once had a repoducable bug with 3-way mirrors and zpool split in sol11.2 - since then I'm careful with split ;)
15:19:39 <Agnar> I should reconsider my default behaviour now :)
16:02:50 <danmcd> I've never split from anything more than 2-way.  For all I know you might be able to reproduce that bug on illumos.  (If you have the reproduction handy I have a VMware environment where I can test a 3-way mirror rather easily.)
17:02:17 <yuripv> rmustacc: hi, i was looking for execvpe() implementation and noticed that you have https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/2066; it seems it's not ready for review yet though?
17:02:18 <fenix> → CODE REVIEW 2066: 7125 Provide execvpe (NEW) | https://www.illumos.org/issues/7125
19:39:28 <rmustacc> yuripv: I drafted it, but never had a chance to write tests or use it anywhere.
19:41:50 <rmustacc> yuripv: What'd be most helpful to you? I guess I could refresh it and maybe force myself to write some tests?