01:05:16 <dangergrrl> nice toasterson 
07:45:57 <Aedil> Until which generation of Intel CPU's is supported in OpenIndiana illumos for graphics acceleration? Thanks!
10:45:25 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 15414 Update intel CPU Microcode to 20230214 -- Andy Fiddaman <illumos⊙fn>
11:36:54 <xaero> will be illumos be 'rebasing' to the the same openzfs repo as freebsd and linux?
12:21:48 <Denis> hello all. the sed that comes with illumos supports -E because it seems to be FreeBSD sed. the sed that comes with Solaris 11.3 and 11.4 does not support -E
12:23:00 <Denis> what would be the right way to refer to a particular version/date that made "sed -E" available in illumos?
13:49:25 <yuripv> Denis: just check if -E is supported instead? there are no "versions" in illumos
14:00:50 <Aedil> Until which generation of Intel CPU's is supported in OpenIndiana illumos for graphics acceleration? Thanks!
15:25:10 <Denis> alright
15:25:40 <rmustacc> Practically speaking though it came in https://www.illumos.org/issues/509.
15:25:42 <fenix> → BUG 509: need an open source sed(1) replacement (Resolved)
15:26:28 <rmustacc> So as long as someone is running something at least 10+ years old, you'll have it.
15:27:10 <andyf> It's worth noting that SmartOS reverted illumos 586 (fenix) though.
15:27:11 <fenix> BUG 586: sed -i should take an "optional" argument (Resolved)
15:27:11 <fenix> ↳ https://www.illumos.org/issues/586
15:27:23 <andyf> which is an unfortunate difference between illumos distributions
15:27:53 <rmustacc> Getting broken was unfortunate.
15:28:12 <andyf> So feature tests are definitely the way to go if you can.
19:14:10 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 15472 ::x86_featureset could accept arbitrary addresses -- Richard Lowe <richlowe⊙rn>
19:14:10 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 15484 bitext should include types.h, not debug.h -- Richard Lowe <richlowe⊙rn>
19:48:39 <richlowe> andyf: rather than waiting until everyone updates their shadows, can I suggest email telling them to and specifying the tag, and then giving them a week?
19:49:39 <andyf> We could do that as part of the primary switch I suppose
19:54:22 <andyf> I started on that because I got a review comment saying that I should use `%h` in some code I wrote, and when I tried the compiler complained. I wonder how many people have done the same at some point.
19:55:06 <andyf> The new gcc 10 primary will handle it, so it's just any lingering old shadows. A week is a bit swift though, OmniOS will probably take a couple of weeks to update gcc 7 on all releases.
20:46:37 <richlowe> I suppose that's true, I always forget lts build capable of building illumos
20:46:38 <richlowe> mostly