15:44:52 [illumos-gate] 15399 snoop: when tcp payload size is 0, there is no next protocol -- Toomas Soome 17:29:41 [illumos-gate] 15384 libefi: add efi_devpath_next_instance() -- Toomas Soome 17:41:09 [illumos-gate] 15403 statd: Fix the wrong use of logical AND in place of bitwise AND operator. -- Suresh Jayaraman 18:08:39 @tsoome_ 18:08:47 yes? 18:25:27 NVM. 18:25:41 New for-loop rules caught a smartos-only piece of zoneadmd.c: 18:25:56 https://github.com/TritonDataCenter/illumos-joyent/commit/3a61b470f77f33aeb7ba18907c25e1f5d47e1497 18:26:07 Thought I had Real Problems, but it was just my own. 18:43:10 yes, previously you had to have those or cstyle did complain. 18:45:49 Did the style rules change? I thought that they were unchangeable given that we are using "Bill Joy Normal Form". 18:46:19 Someone in #c was telling me that we should not require parentheses for sizeof or return. I replied that it was not up to me. 18:49:35 no, just fixed previously broken for loop check 18:50:37 btw, fbsd insists parentheses for return, but not for sizeof. 18:50:47 small but annoying difference 18:51:40 tsoome_: Where is that fix? We might need it in OpenZFS to ensure that we are using the same style rules. 18:52:53 *our* ZFS needed no changes, AFAICT, so OpenZFS is *likely* in the clear. See my illumos-joyent commit above for an example. 18:54:01 ryao 14596 18:57:54 tsoome_: Thanks. 18:58:35 Ultimately, illumos style is not set in stone and is something that we as a project will evolve. For example, alignof didn't exist, but we need to update tracking for it in tools. 19:08:04 I am fine with using the same style that we have always used unless there is a new reason to change/amend it. 19:08:18 alignof would be one such reason. 20:06:41 [illumos-gate] 15419 comments in amdzen.c could be edited -- Dan Cross 20:21:05 [illumos-gate] 15292 sgs: set but not used variable -- Toomas Soome