01:45:34 <antranigv> signals ARE bastards, except SIGINFO, that one is pure love.
11:58:25 <toasterson> Doeas anybody have some old Docs that show how SPARC informed our kernel of device changes? I am currently reading through device tree's and wondering what the Mechanism for the same problem was on SPARC since device trees (as a concept) are not just a Linux invention although the current format might be.
11:58:31 <toasterson> s/Doeas/Does/
14:05:01 <paulf> what is the most bog standard gcc for OI?
14:14:24 <paulf> let's see what illumos-gcc does
14:18:11 <tsoome> transitioning to 10
14:22:00 <paulf> just want to test a patch I'm working on for Valgrind that will report use of realloc with size 0
14:46:09 <paulf> +warning: Invalid entry in .debug_gdb_scripts section
14:48:03 <paulf> Poo
15:46:22 <sommerfeld> I sent an RTI to advocates⊙lio yesterday at around 5PM pacific.  I haven't seen any response (which is ok) but it also hasn't appeared in the topicbox archive at https://illumos.topicbox.com/groups/advocates yet which has me wondering if it fell into a black hole.
15:50:03 <toasterson> paulf: 7.5-illumos and 10-illumos
18:42:47 <richlowe> sommerfeld: it did, but I think someone caught up to it this morning.
18:43:14 <richlowe> toasterson: I can't work out what you're trying to do with the FDT IPD, you should add some goals or the like.
18:43:47 <richlowe> or if you're just trying to describe what we do right now (which maybe should be in the ARM one? I dunno)
18:46:53 <toasterson> I try to make sure we can boot and run properly not just with ACPI which was all our last discussions.
18:47:20 <richlowe> Right, at present we boot and run properly with everything _except_ ACPI :)
18:47:45 <richlowe> you seemed like you were setting out to describe the bit that worked, which is a good idea, I just wondered 1) if that was right, and 2) whether it should be separate or in the ARM one 
18:47:56 <richlowe> #2 because I have that same question about some other work I'm just about done with.
18:48:40 <toasterson> which is what we want.
18:48:40 <toasterson> Basically I was trying to figure out what work we would need to do have ARM Device tree support and how that actually works. And with the descriptions peolpe are passing to me now I am able to see the ancestry between what we have and FDT
18:49:41 <toasterson> My thought process is always a chaos until I talk a bit to people
18:50:46 <toasterson> As far as I can see right now (not yet written down in the IPD) is that we have device tree support already but not the Subset that is the new FDT format and the FDT blobs. So we only need a parser support for fdt to our format
18:51:11 <toasterson> and a place to decide where to put the blobs on the FS and how to distribute them
18:51:24 <toasterson> The IPD will ultimetly be about that
19:04:16 <sommerfeld> richlowe: indeed, looks like it got unstuck.   Thanks for taking a look.  Can you handle the push as suggested by Garrett or should I find someone else?
19:12:09 <richlowe> I can get it.  Thanks for doing this. :)
19:13:58 <sommerfeld> Thanks again.
20:40:36 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 15351 Inconsistent variant.arch tags in newer packages -- Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld⊙ame>
21:00:57 <sjorge> for the FOSDEM folks, i found the box with flyers and one more 4XL T-shirt
21:01:01 <sjorge> will bring it on saturday
21:01:27 <sjorge> someone is giving me a lift so not sure how early i will be, or how late i can stay
21:06:25 <richlowe> oh, it's fosdem now?
21:06:27 <richlowe> that explains a lot.
21:50:15 <sjorge> no
21:50:18 <sjorge> next weekend
21:50:32 <sjorge> first weekend of february