03:13:48 <blackhawk> is this the only open source unix now ? like the only one with it's source code public ?
03:17:13 <jclulow> What is UNIX, really
03:17:19 <jclulow> We're definitely not certified 
03:23:05 <jbk> though we might perhaps be considered certifiable :)
03:23:52 <Smithx10> jbk:  until you can blink my drive slot you are not a unix :P lol j/k  <3 
03:33:34 <blackhawk> UNIX, the OS made by Ken Thompspon ...
03:36:34 <jbk> Smithx10: do you know which slot it actually is, or do you need to locate that?
03:38:32 <jbk> since sestopo seems to have data about things, even if fmtopo is having issues, it might be possible to do something with libses
03:40:21 <jbk> or if not, which disk are you looking for?
04:12:54 <jclulow> blackhawk: I think Mr Thompson would be the first to acknowledge we are pretty far from that OS
07:23:34 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 15281 common: remove pragma ident -- Toomas Soome <tsoome⊙mc>
12:12:06 <tsoome> um... is thats still real ....  man -s 3curses tparm joy of binary compatibility?
18:18:49 <danmcd> So I'd mentioned doing some test-run comparisons between gcc10 and default using smartos-test.
18:19:56 <danmcd> I saw no regressions using a gcc10 built platform vs. a default (gcc7) platform.  The gcc10 also had DEBUG on it, so it might not have been as clean and experiment (two changes, not just one), but given recent discussions about gcc10, and andyf's closure of the one bug, I figured this would be grist for the switch-to-gcc10 mill.
18:20:59 <danmcd> (In my perfect world, this switch would happen on-or-after February 9th. But I know about perfect worlds and all that.) 
18:31:14 <andyf> It's as good a date to aim for as any other
20:28:21 <richlowe> tsoome: I have no idea what that question means?
20:28:35 <richlowe> does it relate to me having tried to review marco's code and ran into that mess?
20:28:40 <richlowe> because if so, I don't know the answer either.
20:28:52 <richlowe> the joy of being the code reviewer is I can go "What the fuck?" and wait for answers :)
20:29:02 <richlowe> (I'm maybe joking, you'll never know...)
20:30:15 <jperkin> richlowe: sorry had to wait for a couple of other builds to finish first, the updated ld-no-strip-groups build is now running
20:30:38 <richlowe> jperkin: no problem, obviously I'm largely devoting myself to another project right now too :) 
20:31:05 <tsoome> richlowe you mean my question+:)
20:31:12 <tsoome> ?
20:31:39 <richlowe> tsoome: yes, the tparm thing
20:31:41 <tsoome> danmcd it would be really nice if we could get that page turned too:)
20:32:52 <tsoome> tparm in 3Curses context is tparm(char *, long1, ..., long9), in other systems, its tparm(char *, ...) :)
20:33:13 <tsoome> thats is, we have pre-varargs code there:)
20:34:12 <tsoome> with modern compiler, it means many zeroes
20:34:57 <richlowe> tsoome: oh, so, right, marco was porting that to 64bit, and I have comments out standing that are, basically "oh god"
20:35:10 <tsoome> :D