12:13:45 <tsoome> please see https://code.illumos.org/c/illumos-gate/+/2082 :)
12:13:46 <fenix> → CODE REVIEW 2082: 14596 cstyle should allow empty increment with for loop (NEW) | https://www.illumos.org/issues/14596
12:24:21 <jlevon> andyf: wow that setcontext() bug is crazy
12:29:20 <tsoome> it is:D
13:16:40 <andyf> jlevon - one line fix, but a lot of fun tracking it down (and I should say thanks to @rmustacc for guiding me through that)
13:17:11 <jlevon> I swear there's an inverse correlation between effort to RCA and size of resulting patch
13:32:43 <jbk> heh yeah
13:39:28 <andyf> The {get,set}context() stuff is really badly defined and documented too, as far as I could find. No mention of interaction with threads other than that threads are the replacement.
16:47:31 <neirac> Is it possible to use java -XX:+ExtendedDTraceProbes with our version of java?
16:59:57 <jperkin> if someone has fixed the dtrace support in recent versions I'd like to know, I currently --disable-dtrace in openjdk17
17:00:31 <jperkin> it broke somewhere around openjdk10 and I didn't debug it yet
17:33:48 <neirac> jperkin thanks, it was useful to have it, maybe andyf or petertribble have more info on that
21:30:41 <neirac> rmustacc  I just created a smartos iso with the add vioif alias but still did not attach I can run dtrace now as I hardcoded pit_is_broken to make it boot
22:11:31 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 15181 Add errc, verrc, warnc, vwarnc to libc -- Andy Fiddaman <illumos⊙fn>
22:11:31 <gitomat> [illumos-gate] 15175 Update intel CPU Microcode to 20221108 -- Andy Fiddaman <illumos⊙fn>
22:50:07 <tsoome> is someone checking my RTI's too?:)
22:50:57 <otis> i do, but can't commit.
22:51:16 <tsoome> eh:)
22:51:54 <tsoome> hm, vmware has released fusion 13...
22:53:55 <richlowe> I responded to the only one that seems like it's in an area I know about just now tsoome
22:53:57 <richlowe> you won't be happy with me though
22:54:45 <yuripv> "on Intel or Apple Silicon Macs", finally
22:55:04 <yuripv> took them only 2 years :D
22:55:30 <tsoome> yuripv there was tech preview available;)
22:56:09 <richlowe> tsoome: if the backlog is big, it might be worth emailing advocates a list, because a lot of us have been busy and obviously it's been a holiday in the US
22:56:17 <richlowe> sorry
22:56:47 <tsoome> indeed, no big issue anyhow.
22:57:18 <richlowe> You have colleagues who are (were?) able to deal with them, and aren't your reviewers too
22:57:24 <richlowe> if you wanted to wake them up :)
23:03:52 <tsoome> oh and clock bug did bite again.