00:24:57 <hernan604> rtprio: ok
00:26:06 <hernan604> btw, if i install a fresh freebsd on a running system, the zpools must be re-created on the new OS install right ?
00:32:56 <rwp> hernan604, It is not necessary to recreate zfs pools for a new install.  zfs pools are very portable.  Can mount them on different systems.  Can even mount them on linux systems!
00:53:49 <hernan604> rwp: ok
00:53:50 <hernan604> thakns
00:57:34 <rwp> The one thing to know about zfs pools is their feature level.  New features are added over time.  Once upgraded then the system mounting it must know how to handle the new features.  An older system won't be able to mount a newer zfs upgraded to a new feature that it does not know about.
01:04:42 <hernan604> rwp: right, thanks man
08:47:10 <r00t-h4x0r> hi all :)
08:47:39 <st_iron> hi
08:49:25 <r00t-h4x0r> hi st_iron
08:49:27 <r00t-h4x0r> how are you
08:49:29 <r00t-h4x0r> :)
08:49:48 <r00t-h4x0r> so you are big fan of freebsd ?
08:49:53 <r00t-h4x0r> :)
08:50:08 <r00t-h4x0r> what your question about that freebsd os
08:50:12 <r00t-h4x0r> i am the coder
08:51:44 * iRobbery checks if anybody touched his supply
08:52:31 <st_iron> thank you r00t-h4x0r i use freebsd, and i don't have questions atm
08:53:44 <r00t-h4x0r> i see
08:53:53 <r00t-h4x0r> which version
08:54:05 <r00t-h4x0r> freebsd is so cool
08:54:13 <r00t-h4x0r> the kernel is different and fast
08:54:36 <r00t-h4x0r> so you should use it even in production if the driver or kernel support it
08:54:54 <r00t-h4x0r> don't believe linux or linux or windows or other OS
08:55:08 <r00t-h4x0r> that freebsd Our code is x0r t0r Kid
08:55:24 <r00t-h4x0r> yeah it x0r t0r
08:55:41 <iRobbery> drugs are bad mmmkay
08:55:57 <r00t-h4x0r> mean the stablest among other OS
08:56:15 <r00t-h4x0r> not much linux even performance compare to freebsd
08:56:30 <r00t-h4x0r> that's why We make opensense firewall using freebsd kernel
08:56:45 <r00t-h4x0r> openbsd too
08:56:52 <r00t-h4x0r> don't believe it is moron Kid
08:57:05 <r00t-h4x0r> is Us that promote Linux to make it big
08:57:19 <r00t-h4x0r> doesn't mean other OS From Us is stupid
08:57:34 <r00t-h4x0r> We don't include latest driver or release to latest one because
08:57:46 <r00t-h4x0r> We want it to be stable with limited hardware
08:57:58 <r00t-h4x0r> doesn't mean it is stupid
08:58:19 <r00t-h4x0r> do you know in year 2000 freebsd not even once reboot for one year
08:58:22 <r00t-h4x0r> not even get hack
08:59:46 <st_iron> r00t-h4x0r: freebsd-version
08:59:48 <st_iron> 15.0-RELEASE-p9
09:00:08 <st_iron> i assume everyone in this channel use this version
09:00:18 <st_iron> more or less
09:03:05 <r00t-h4x0r> hmm i see
09:03:13 <r00t-h4x0r> home server "?
09:03:21 <r00t-h4x0r> uname -a for me
09:03:30 <r00t-h4x0r> let me see what your hardware
09:10:47 <iRobbery> https://static01.nyt.com/images/2007/06/27/technology/28computer.600.jpg
11:18:38 <o0x1eef> I also have this keyboard iRobbery
12:02:46 <iRobbery> :)
22:28:46 <ant-x> Hello, all. I want to install blacklistd to control connections to my server over HTTP and SOCKS. For http, I use thttpd(8). How am I to cause thttpd to notify blacklistd of all connections in the format rquired by the latter?
22:29:46 <ant-x> By default, blacklistd listens to /var/run/blacklistd.sock, but surely thttpd is ignorant of it?
22:29:55 <MelanieUrsidino> thttpd as far as I know needs special support to be able to contact blocklistd (as it's now called), and I don't know if it has it.
22:31:25 <ant-x> Hello, MelanieUrsidino. IRC is a small place :-) So, you say that blocklistd expects programs to have special support for it?
22:32:19 <ant-x> If thttpd does provide for blocklistd notification, perhaps I should consider fail2ban, which monitors logfiles.
22:33:22 <ant-x> Well, or I could use the `t' in thttpd, of which one meaning is `throttling'.
22:34:32 <MelanieUrsidino> my understanding is that blocklistd requires clients to pass it the file descriptor that was the blocked connection.
22:34:45 <MelanieUrsidino> or, not blocked, but studied.
22:35:54 <ant-x> As I understand from a glimps and the man page, blocklistd monitors a socket or a list of sockets, so that other programs are expected to write to those sockets their connection events.
22:37:15 <ant-x> I should not like to scan the logs myself for relevant entries, convert them into the required format, and write to the bloclistd's socket.
22:46:07 <ivy> no, blocklistd requires the application to pass the client socket, as MelanieUrsidino said.  you can't just write data to the socket to make it block something
23:02:01 <ant-x> Then I missed where blocklistd documents this. fail2ban is certainly more loosely coupled.
23:02:57 <ivy> the third paragraph of blocklistd(8): The way blocklistd does configuration entry matching is by having the client side pass the file descriptor associated with the connection the client wants to blocklist as well as passing socket credentials.
23:19:36 <ant-x> Ah, OK. Is that data based to the socket to which blocklistd is listening?
23:20:52 <ivy> what do you mean?
23:42:55 <ant-x> ivy, I mean, I don't understand how the client (is an httpd a client?) passes the connection file descriptro to blocklistd.
23:50:41 <polarian> hey
23:50:49 <polarian> is there a way to install a port from /usr/ports into a jail :p
23:51:09 <polarian> yes yes use poudriere is the solution to every problem these days, but I am purely curious
23:51:57 <polarian> you can make package and move the .pkg to the jail and then pkg-add(8) it
23:52:21 <polarian> I dont see anything else in the ports man page though