00:18:03 *sigh* et tu, freebsd 00:47:22 ehh> 00:47:24 ? 01:21:22 ws=\w 04:02:21 Oh, no. 04:04:58 anth: ? 04:06:45 I went looking for what Ltning might’ve been talking about, and made a guess. Lots if talk in the past day anout seeing “AI” “contributions” in freebsd (although possibly notnin main yet? I haven’t been able to validate yet). 04:07:41 FreeBSD was my first unix, way back in the late 1900s; I run it personally and for clients. 04:08:32 I don’t know how to communicate to the foundation or core how assuridly this will have me moving to another BSD and urging everyone else to. 04:09:34 anth: Do you count AI assisted as AI generated? 04:16:39 the whole thing is pernicious, because absent extremely careful review, most "generated" code looks superficially acceptable (by its nature) but then has egregious issues when actually thought about 04:17:03 the difference between "assisted" and "generated" is quite subjective, and most of the aggresive AI booster types will call the latter as the former 04:17:59 it's usually pretty obvious when it's being looked for, but imo anything more than "accepted a few lines as a completion" is straying into the dangerous / problematic domain, especially for core SW that is supposed to be reliable 04:18:23 like I wouldn't be too unhappy about slop packages or whatever in the ports tree, but the core stuff should be held to a higher standard 04:21:40 xales: right,I’m not religious about packages or ports. But core needs to be held to the highest standards. 04:21:50 Bah, I’ve got to. 04:21:58 Go to bed.