00:04:26 You are some veteran! 00:08:05 Experiences measured by tooth marks in my rear! 01:02:44 ant-x: You best be posting on that reddit post. 02:41:50 is there a way to query for the changelog before updating a package? 03:00:31 rrahl0: not really, ports commits usually just say something like "bump port version" 03:05:00 rtprio: thanks. on that note, is there some explanation about versioning? still trying to figure out what version,2 and version_2,2 means 03:19:06 some of those are a library that changed version and there's a token ,2 at the end so that the dependant package rebuilds 04:58:19 rrahl0, You could always look at the ports commit log: https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/log/ 10:31:04 rtprio: it failed : i'm done, lets reinstall 10:31:16 on another hosting solution 10:42:38 I have ended up in a situation where I have two hosts with an identical /etc/hostid. As this is not an ideal situation I wonder what things should I consider before changing the hostid 10:44:15 (I guess this happened as I swapped out a motherboard from one system and later used that one to build another system) 11:37:57 rrahl0, rtprio: additionally to the normal version of a project the package has the components PORTREVISION and PORTEPOCH, displayed as _,. PORTREVISION changes if the port changes in some way that requires a rebuild without the version changing and (should) reset to 0 when the version changes. PORTEPOCH is for cases where upstream changes its versioning scheme 11:37:59 and the new version would compare less than the old version, so we need to tell pkg that it is really newer https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/makefiles/#makefile-naming-revepoch 13:15:15 nimaje: are you sure about the portepoch? because afair, firefox-esr never changed it's versioning, but it's still at 140.7.0_2,2 13:20:12 seems like the change from epoch 1 to 2 was an accident in https://cgit.freebsd.org/ports/commit/?id=295bd455773511e71d4739fc3576b37fd8eee349 should have been an PORTREVISION bump 13:22:34 nimaje: thanks 13:22:44 and epoch 1 seems to be copied from firefox when the -esr port was added 14:59:10 Oks4: i don't think it's a big deal [but i'm not certain where all that's used] 15:12:53 thanks. i tried to look info about it but could not find much. at least it results my bridge interfaces sharing a mac address :( 15:13:13 yeah, probably better rm it and re-create it 20:06:36 In bhyve's internal DHCP can I pass PXE options to the guest? 20:08:22 wait, since when does bhyve have a dhcp server? 20:10:55 news to me as well 20:11:58 do you mean the efi loader dhclient ? 20:24:08 ah, yeah a dhcp client in the uefi firmware for pxe boot makes sense, but no idea about that 20:28:04 that's neat thank you 22:49:07 noticed a strange behaviour on FreeBSD 14.3 with /bin/sh. If I have `function FUNC_NAME() { ... }` then /bin/sh will fail after complaining: Syntax error "(" is unexpected. The man page for sh though says that the syntax should be `function FUNC_NAME ( ) { ... }`. If I don't use `function` then everything works fine. 22:50:44 Am I missing something? 22:55:44 Does /bin/sh support the "function" syntax? That's a ksh'ism. Avoid it and I am sure it works. 22:56:01 Something like "foo() { echo foo; }" without saying "function" at all there. 23:09:14 mns: hm, where did you find that the function definition syntax would be `function FUNC_NAME() { ... }`? the man page states clearly ´The syntax of a function definition is name ( ) command´ under "Functions" 23:12:45 so bsdinstall doesnt want to work with IPv6-only 23:12:51 offline install is pkgbase only 23:13:03 and I think everyone knows how I feel about pkgbase 23:13:23 bsdinstall keeps breaking networking, I cant jump into it setting up the O 23:13:25 oS* 23:13:56 nimaje: blimey! I must be blind! I misread that section on Functions! 23:20:59 has anyone done an IPv6 only install on freebsd 15.0-RELEASE 23:21:10 I keep getting transitive dns failures 23:21:20 drop into shell, everything works fine 23:21:29 although bsdinstall sometimes deletes /etc/resolv.conf for no fucking reason 23:23:19 polarian: yes 23:23:31 it worked fine, during setup I gave it a v6 nameserver 23:25:50 deimosBSD: im using my own nameserver 23:25:53 on my router 23:26:03 keep getting dns errors 23:26:24 I am using a mirror iso now 23:26:34 I was using my own compiled one, I got a feeling -p2 might have been an issue 23:26:40 so I am using a mirrored iso, and then I will try again 23:28:34 but tbh with pkgbase, I think I want to script my own installs and if bsdinstall drops it 23:28:46 I think I will dump bsdinstall and just do a manual install, and script that from scratch 23:29:35 i believe bsdinstall was created to improve installs from scripts. We've come full circle in 20 years. 23:30:21 out of curiosity, does it work with a public nameserver? Like 2620:fe::fe (quad9)? 23:48:39 nope 23:48:44 I cant bsdinstall with IPv6 23:48:53 it keeps deleting /etc/resolv.conf 23:49:04 deimosBSD: will try now 23:50:37 deimosBSD: nope 23:50:39 still nothing 23:50:47 and bsdinstall KEEPS TRYING TO FUCKING PKGBASE 23:50:54 piece of shit. 23:57:42 deimosBSD: fetching the sets works fine