06:23:27 $ man make -> mandoc: : SYSERR: write: Broken pipe error bsd14? 06:23:50 ^ :q 06:25:28 END q, works, END :q works 06:41:01 do anyone getting firefox missing from pkg repo? the default FreeBSD one 06:41:29 pkg install firefox 06:41:43 pkg: No packages available to install matching 'firefox' have been found in the repositories 06:41:58 firefox-esr? 06:42:04 i suspect pkg database is screwed somehow? 06:42:20 the same with firefox-esr 06:42:58 pkg update 06:43:07 i did that 06:43:48 cat /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf ? 06:44:15 pastebin please 06:47:10 https://termbin.com/t33e 06:50:38 sorry no idea, see someone else :) 06:50:51 sure 06:51:40 can you just check "man make" "q" error? 06:52:02 sorry? 06:53:53 terminal, $ man make, :q (quit) write: Broken pipe? 06:55:58 i don't have that 06:56:16 i think it is fixed in stable/14 is what i use build from sources 06:58:32 i am just 14.2, was just testing it 07:06:39 hmmm fbsd15 vm works 07:06:54 15.0 i mean 09:25:32 Hello 09:37:25 * jgh spots a Nightwish fan 09:45:04 @jgh, thanks 10:05:43 angry_vincent: did you look for fallouts? https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=www%2Ffirefox%24 11:21:44 w00t! From 2.5MB/s to ~20MB/s wifi transfers. Thank you bz@, adrian@, the foundation and everyone else involved! 14:17:36 When did the wifi improvements come in? 14:18:26 Yesterday I think 14:18:47 Check the freebsd-wireless mailing list 14:19:35 Cool. Updating now. 14:22:18 * cracauer is cursing the locked-in wifi modules in thinkpads. 14:23:33 nimaje: i can't :) because no firefox installed. 14:24:13 jgh: did somebody say Nightwish? 14:24:34 :) 14:26:16 nimaje: allright, i was able to browse with emacs, thx. 14:26:33 well, the package just failed to build is a more likely explaination, than the pkg repo being somehow broken 14:27:05 maybe 14:28:17 i was getting a lot of failures due to rust. i do not know whether it is related to recent LLVM_DEFAULT bump to 19. As well as base llvm version is at 19 too 14:29:13 rust does build it's own llvm for itself. but maybe some parts of base's llvm are used during compilation. 14:29:33 i am trying to figure out 14:29:52 it is not that i hate rust but it's being problematic all the time 15:36:09 allright, latest pkg repo update has the firefox pkg 16:22:29 will it be removed ? 16:27:19 'it'? 16:27:32 firefox pkg 16:28:11 https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/ 16:38:31 I am getting 32 and 42 MB/sec out of today's wifi in -current, without setting any variables. Is that expected? I thought I had to enable the new code. 16:40:15 цоол 16:40:20 cool 16:52:22 Setting the variables makes sending go up to 44 MB/s, but overall not much change. 19:21:09 Hi. Is it possible to use Brave Browser in FreeBSD through any linux-emulation script or FreshPorts? Would be glad to get some advice 19:27:01 Probably. I don't personally use it, but a quick search shows results like: https://github.com/mrclksr/linux-browser-installer. That page has also has a link to a relevant FreeBSD forums post. 19:27:06 icarious: Have you tried installing linux-brave package and then just run in? 19:29:12 dh, I have not. I am a Linux User looking to shift to FreeBSD. Brave Browser is a vital piece of software for me. May be the only hurdle. If I am correct there are two ways to use Brave in FreeBSD. The linux-browser-installer method as psychonate suggested, but the script seems a little unmaintained. And then Freshports. Can I get some documentation how to install the linux-brave package as you mentioned from Fresh Ports? 19:29:50 I mean, I just need some basic documentation on how to use any package from Fresh Ports. 19:31:07 Freshports is just an informative website 19:31:26 You install packages with pkg, for example in case of linux-brave "pkg install linux-brave" 19:32:02 dh, oh ok. Thanks for that. I thought Fresh Ports like some third party ports collection like Gentoo has with overlays or Arch Linux's AUR 19:32:21 Ok. Let me install FreeBSD, get Gnome working and see how brave works. I didn't know Brave had an official port now 19:32:44 That's wonderful to know 19:33:12 I honestly didn't realize there was a package and port for linux-brave heh 19:33:16 https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/ports/ 19:33:37 dh, Do I need to configure the linux emulation in FreeBSD before installing linux-brave? 19:33:50 Probably not 19:33:59 psychonate, I know. Even I was confused. I checked the status of brave back in 2023. And linux-browser-installer was all you had back then 19:34:04 dh, thanks mate 19:34:29 It seems like Tor Browser is supported too 19:34:30 When installing a package you get bunch of messages related to packages which tell you if you need to do something to make full use of package 19:34:55 https://www.freshports.org/www/tor-browser/ like wth. When did this happen lol 19:36:19 Damn. I am so done with Linux. I just needed Brave/ Tor Browser/ The Official Mullvad APP to work in freebsd and then switch. Mullvad I might just use their wireguard config files. But I am so glad to know Brave and Tor Browser is ported in FreeBSD 19:36:25 I've been using LibreWolf, which I like, but I can't say that I've done a deep comparison of many different browsers 19:37:01 I have a couple of yubikeys that I use for some sites. I'm curious if that would work alright with linux emulation and some browser therein 19:37:03 psychonate, the LibreWolf Firefox config was my last backup trust me. But its good to know Brave is supported 19:37:20 psychonate, oh btw, there s Zen Browser now. Which is like the Brave Browser of the Firefox world. 19:37:54 https://zen-browser.app/ 19:38:26 Getting Brave and Zen working would be a massive incentive for privacy loving people 19:40:45 Working hardware security key support, specifically for yubikeys, is a must for me though. That works for me with the native LibreWolf port. I'm not sure how difficult it would be to make that work in the Linux emulation. 19:41:39 These days for MFA on sites, I prefer security key; if I can't do that, then OTP; if I can't do that, then email. 19:41:48 But I'm definitely pushing for the security keys whenever possible. 19:44:10 Well. I am very basic Privacy/ Security oriented user. I know FreeBSD doesn't have Secure Boot enabled. As flawed as most modern Secure Boot inplementations are, it would be great to have those shim/ Microsoft Keys signed Secure Boot keys for FreeBSD like some of them Linuxes have. That aside, I just use Full Disk Encryption, Brave and Mullvad. The rest, I have nothing else that FreeBSD cannot provide to me that Linux Does. I am sick and tired of 19:44:11 Linux and systemd 19:47:46 Yubikey works, atleast in conjuction with ssh (not that I use it, but researched it some time ago) .. how well this support translates to other applications I don't know 19:49:50 Yep, I have some older yubikeys that I use on my other FreeBSD laptop and my FreeBSD desktop. Works fine with the browser and in PAM with pam_u2f. 19:50:27 I guess I am little out on the loop with this yubikey thing. Need to know more about it. 19:51:34 I mostly followed this: https://gist.github.com/spmzt/9436b30fb93ca6227e7f44769df71e4e 19:52:05 icarious the problem is, just shim and couple keys do not actually provide the security, the way the shim is created is just about playing the good kid and thats it. 19:52:13 It's sort of like having a little smartcard, but it's a USB device 19:52:55 Ya I just got the basics through searching. Might read more over the weekend 19:53:22 There should be a freebsd-security or freebsd-privacy for us people to get along. Lol 19:53:24 PAM in FreeBSD and linux can use it for MFA 19:53:42 And some websites and other apps 19:54:09 There are other security key manufacturers out there, too, but yubico is the only brand I've personally used 19:55:20 icarious: #freebsd has such low volume I don't think separate specialized channel is warranted, if that's what you were suggesting 19:55:30 dh, ya that's true I guess 19:56:22 psychonate, I see. I guess I am very old school local person. I don't have great use of modern "Apps" and Websites with 2FA/ MFA. I just want my local data to be encrypted. And use a strong VPN like MullVad, Tor Browser and have a Browser Like Brave blocking trackers. That's my workflow 19:57:22 What I mean to say, as long as Full Disk Encryption, a Quantum-Reistent VPN provider like MullVad and a Tracker Blocking secure browser like Brave works. I am satisfied for now 19:58:13 Firefox with various extensions won't do it for you? 19:59:13 dh, It would. but Firefox still doesn't have the greatest security features of a chrome based browser like Brave. I mean, I know they have imrpoved a lot lately. 19:59:45 Firefox's Sandboxing is still not top notch compared to Chrome based Browsers 20:01:06 Like I use GrapheneOS in my Pixel mobile. Vanadium is like the most secure browser at the moment. Firefox in Desktop comes nowhere close to its Security 20:01:39 icarious: chromium and firefox sandboxing is about the same on freebsd, i.e. there is none 20:02:29 chromium sandboxes rely on seccomp on linux and would have to use capsicum on freebsd, but don't because it's nearly impossible to maintain and upstream doesn't accept freebsd patches 20:03:42 dstolfa, Ya I know that. I guess I might experient with Running Firefox all jailed in FreeBSD (I need to learn about FreeBSD jails) with Wayland sounds way better 20:04:31 Jailed Firefox + Wayland + Firefox Extentions might just be what I need 20:05:05 Steep learning curve for me ahead afer using Linux since 2003-Current Day 20:05:12 For a jailed browser, I remember playing with this a while ago: https://vermaden.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/secure-containerized-browser/ 20:05:21 But the performance was great, at least on my aging hardware 20:05:26 s/was/wasn't/ 20:05:26 psychonate, thank you so much. Let me read that 20:05:42 From what I've gathered wayland is still a bit beta even on linux, somehow I doubt experience on FreeBSD will be any better 20:05:48 yeah, if you want to "sandbox" a full browser instance (i.e. not every tab, but the entire browser session) then jails will be acceptable. this might help with some RCEs if the jail is sufficiently stripped down 20:07:25 dh, you are not wrong. But it isn't beta for certain use cases. Like I use SwayWM and Wayland just works for me without X and Xwayland for my workflow just fine. But I do agree it is nowhere near as mature as Xorg for most people. 20:08:21 dstolfa, ya that's what I might end up doing. Using Jailed Firefox and see how it works with Wayland (SwayWM / Gnome) under FreeBSD .. If it does work out, I might use those fancy configs like Arkenfox and that's it 20:10:05 Time for me to get out into whatever sunshine is available heh 20:10:10 Final question. My laptop has 8 GB ram. Is it fine to use ZFS with FreeBSD? I won't use any fancy ZFS features, except snapshots which I rely on with BTRFS on Linux 20:10:13 icarious, good luck with your experimenting! 20:10:23 psychonate, thanks mate. Good talks. Hope to see you soon 20:11:48 Friendly people out here. Very polite. Me likes 20:12:44 Uhoh, running FreeBSD on laptop may be a problematic, make sure you check https://wiki.freebsd.org/Laptops 20:13:41 dh, I know lol. FreeBSD is not the most Laptop friendly OS. But I do have a somewhat conservative thinkpad from 2021. But thanks for the alert mate 20:14:54 Honestly. I am really getting frustrated with Linux with the path its taking since systemd/ flatpak and most modern stuff. I am not an anti-modernist. But personally I like a more Traditional and Organic Unix-Like system now that I am in my Mid 30's after using Linux since I was a teenager 20:15:16 As much as I love FreeBSD on the desktop and servers, on laptops I run linux 20:15:20 Fedora 1 was my first Linux distribution 20:16:05 dh, I am a Gentoo/ ArchLInux/ Debian fan. But I do hear you. Linux is definitely very very modern and supports like everything. But I guess I want to go back to a more traditional old-school system 20:17:33 As long as I can experiment with Open Source software, basic secure and private browsing, and my workflow which requires just a browser. I am cool with FreeBSD. 20:17:35 Oh yeah, FreeBSD definitely offers that. Some might even call it archaic 20:18:06 Which is a praise these days, really 20:18:55 Haha Archaic. Sure. For more younger people I do feel them. But for me, its my entire childhood. Most Linuxes back then with their sysvinit style bootup and traditional package management gave you that experience. Right now you just have threee choices if you feel Nostalgic. Either shift to FreeBSD, or just use Gentoo with OpenRC or Devuan .. That's it 20:19:59 I mean, I am not falling behind. I do use AI and all of those modern shinanigans. But I really love my workflow/ operating system to be a little Traditional and Organic. 20:21:58 Speaking of LLM/AI-s that's one of the downside I currently experience with FreeBSD - no out of the box CUDA support 20:22:58 Not a huge problem right now since my GPU is quite old (no tensor cores) and my CPU on the other hand quite new and fast 20:23:29 There's also VirtualBox and GPU passthrough too ofcourse 20:23:57 I just use ChatGPT/ Gemini on a browser. But I would love to experiment with DeepSeek, runnin git locally on both Linux / FreeBSD or any other open source LLM/ AI 20:24:15 *running it 20:25:22 I do love how certain Unix-Like/ Linux based Operating Systems/ Projects like FreeBSD, Gentoo, Devuan have still retained most of their Traditional Characters but don't devoid you of having acess to modern Technology. 20:25:29 ollama/llama.cpp work just fine, just that the GPU acceleration part is lacking 20:26:06 Oh. I see. I still think most Open Source AI/ LLMs are in their infancy. But they will catch up soon 20:28:14 Thinking about Locally Self-Hosted Open Source LLM is not a far cry. We have reached a point like in the 80's during the OS/ PC wars where people thought Community Developed Operating Systems and technologies were done for good 20:31:23 What exacly do you mean by "open source LLMs"? 20:34:18 i want some lib to read text for blind users. Anyone knows any ? 20:34:23 LLM 20:36:11 That was a chilly walk. 20:36:48 On this laptop I use Gentoo (because of the wifi chipset) with OpenRC. I have an older laptop that uses FreeBSD with UFS. 20:37:35 I don't mind still using UFS on that old laptop, because it still supports snapshots. Even 'dump' can automatically create the UFS snapshot for me. 20:37:44 But on my slightly newer desktop, definitely ZFS. 21:17:42 hi\ 21:17:45 please help 21:17:55 I've got a problem with sdd on 14.2 21:18:18 sddm-greeter crashes 21:19:06 (II) DAEMON: Greeter stopped. SDDM::Auth::HelperExitStatus(6) 21:20:30 sddm-greeter --test-mode reports missing platform Qt plugin... 21:22:22 thanks for any help 21:32:06 psychonate, so many nice features in ZFS, especially if you also use jails 21:34:52 Posterdati, have you installed all prerequisites? 21:34:56 sudo pkg install qt5-core qt5-gui qt5-widgets 21:36:28 yes 21:36:38 slim seems to work 21:36:47 it worked before yesterday 21:37:12 thats what she said 21:37:27 check this in rc.conf 21:37:29 dbus_enable="YES" 21:37:29 hald_enable="YES" 21:37:29 sddm_enable="YES" 21:37:37 yes 21:38:31 what is in /usr/local/etc/sdd.conf 21:39:08 no such file or directory 21:39:39 hmm - I am not a sdd user, but I think that is needed? 21:40:00 unfortunately I use sddm not sdd 21:40:21 yeah sorry sddm.conf 21:41:02 its saturday well after 18.00 :-P 21:41:04 InputMethod="" 21:41:11 lol 21:41:13 yeah 21:41:19 hmm 21:41:42 I think maybe you need to somehow configure the session in this file 21:44:27 https://gist.github.com/NikolajHansen/4de2854f654baf10f74967abf34d314b 21:44:49 with a bit of help from my copilot - an example of what you can put into this 21:45:06 try to add the session part just like this 21:45:11 Session= 21:45:27 maybe it needs to be there 21:46:15 key - no value 22:03:10 the github copilot is scarily clever .. 22:07:40 Hi. I'm trying to get as much correct as I can before an install. In the handbook, it says to be sure to have a fully qualified hostname and uses the example machine3.example.com. Would something like randomhostname.localhost count? Where specifically what I'm referring to is .localhost. I've tried more research but am only coming up with fully 22:07:40 qualified domain name and I don't know if they're the same. Ty! 22:12:04 well, that assumes you have your equipment in a (local) domain. if you do not *.localhost may be all you have 22:13:04 or - sorry isn't it *.local (apple style)? 22:13:55 in any case - you can change this later 22:14:57 BarnabasDK Ty for your reply. It's just a home computer on a local network that would be configured dynamically with dhcp. Idk if that matters or helps. Basically, I'm not understanding what the *.example.com is for, or really, I don't have a domain name like that I can use. 22:15:53 well, I work with computers and such and I have a domain config and dns server for my internal network. I think very few have that 22:16:22 so just give your pc/host a good unique hostname 22:16:28 forget about the domain for now 22:17:08 good day, does anyone here know if the AMD Ryzen V3000 series processors are supported under FreeBSD 14.2? 22:17:10 Okay, I see, as long as it's unique. Thank you so much. I really appreciate your time. 22:17:15 np 22:17:23 unique IP as well ofc 22:17:31 if not issued by dhcp 22:17:38 Okay, ty 22:18:28 labrnth, AMD64 arch? 22:19:08 or is this a cpu/gpu on one chip thing? 22:19:23 BarnabasDK: ya....more specifically I'm looking at the Honeycomb Ryzen V3000 22:19:25 https://www.solid-run.com/embedded-networking/ryzen-v3000-cx7-com/#evaluation-board 22:20:28 what happens if you try to boot it? 22:21:07 nice hw btw 22:22:25 I haven't purchased this board yet as I'm trying to gauge the hardware support first 22:22:33 ah 22:22:34 thinking of using this for a bhyve host 22:23:06 96 gb of mem .. damn 22:23:07 and service chaining some virtualized network services on it 22:23:23 Re: local LLMs. I compiled ollama with amd64_v2 (AV2 instructions) and it runs some LLMs OK on 8-core CPUs and DDR4 RAM. 22:23:28 including an OpenBSD firewall 22:24:27 your spec list does not say much about the actual chipsets used 22:25:32 ya, just the processor (V3C18I) 22:25:43 I think they have some docs with that info somewhere 22:25:43 say - the I/O controller - what is it actually 22:26:05 it does list FreeBSD 4 22:26:31 sorry FreeBSD 14 as supported with a caveat of the SFP cage 22:26:35 networking is important - it will work with almost any chipset, but only work really well if you avoid some 22:26:38 like realtek 22:27:21 hope I did not insult anyone 22:29:22 unless you are savy with fetching driver code from realtek, and using that in place of what is distributed with freebsd - in any case - alternatives are better 22:30:29 ..or at least that is my experience having hardware with realtek nics 22:41:35 looks like the ethernet controled (2.5GbE is a Intel i.226) so well supported I think....Intel chipsets are generally the well supported under BSDs...the other networking options are 10Gb SFP optics which I can choose from 22:41:50 intel - no problem what so ever 22:43:07 intel gets a lot of flac from everywhere, but they are generally the best at making open access hw. And even the drivers too 22:44:21 I specifically chose my current laptop because it had an intel main gpu 22:44:42 ya 22:44:53 not the fastest by any measure 22:45:07 but compability is fantastic 22:46:44 please help sddm stopped to work on freebsd 14.2... Any hints? 22:48:04 Posterdati, I would love to help, but if the above did not solve it I think we need the contents of your relevant log files - not here but in some cutn paste service 22:49:20 sddm-greeter exited on signal 6 (core dumped) 22:49:53 yes that tells us what happened, not why 22:51:57 sddm-greeter complains about a missing qt plugin 23:10:29 what plugin :-)