00:01:50 i set up headscale in a VPS jail. all working great. my freebsd box at home runs tailscale (on the host), along with my phone and another couple computers. they all connect. i have the freebsd box at home as an exit node. can i have pf take packets on tailscale0 interface forward http/s packet to my caddy (thin/loopback) jail on the same box? i put an rdr rule, and it doesn't seem to work. 01:06:43 hello. after updating to 13.4 in the userland update step ran out of space in /usr. so far googled 2 options: 1) "freebsd-update IDS" and compare checksums or 2) "freebsd-update rollback" 01:07:13 ids shows quite a few files in lib & lib32 with different checksum 01:08:15 will the rollback send system back to pre-13.4 or just before userland update? 01:09:08 or better try to fetch base.txz and try to fix relevant files? 01:09:33 or is there third option how to proceed 01:17:31 \x0304red\x03 yo 03:26:56 has anyone had good/bad experience with having 1 central /usr/ports tree and using nullfs to "share" the direcotry with multiple jails? 03:27:33 i am building a few systems out of /usr/ports and i am making multiple copies of the ports.git and it just seems to be a waste of space and a burdne on management.. where something like a nullfs to the server to each jail would be "easier" 03:28:48 space is not a constraint, it is more my sanity of management 03:33:20 voy4g3r2: cant you mount the /usr/ports dir in the jail ? 03:33:45 mount $host:/user/ports into each jail 03:34:04 yes, that is what i was thinking.. i can setup a fstab in my jails to mount the /usr/ports from host 03:34:12 i was just wondering, if ther eis something i may be missing 03:34:26 just setup the fstab and mount it 03:34:28 if i build one package in one jail and do another in another jail. there is an impact.. or it is isolated enough to not be a concern 03:35:46 i may just end up making a poudriere and have it just build my packages for each jail 03:37:04 voy4g3r2: whatever 03:37:29 but if you are unsure, try building a simple port and see if anything remains inside /usr/ports 03:37:49 doing it now.. 03:37:58 i was just thinking while i was waiting for the tree to build 03:38:49 voy4g3r2: you are always a step ahead 03:39:51 i have been known to do that and was like "what happens if i just use one central /usr/ports instead of having now 6.. one for each jail" 03:39:58 just seemed real stupid 03:43:11 if jails are similar versions, and ports are built with similar parameters .. then yes... nonsense 03:43:27 and if you are just building with defaults.. also nonsense.. just use pkg 03:43:49 or build the poudriere repo 03:46:35 which i take it is where poudriere ports -c -p default comes in 03:46:55 becasue the jellyfin, zoneminder, grafana packages is setup with options, specific to my build 03:47:17 and the whole pkg vs ports builds.. mix-up blah 03:47:28 but thanks for the confirmation.. too many /usr/ports is a bad thing 08:19:08 +1 poudriere 16:20:04 seems poudriere and git are the things I need to be learning about. All the cool kids are using them 16:33:24 SponiX: what source control do you know? 16:34:15 rtprio: none, I've avoided learning them over the years lol 16:34:59 okay, that is one approach. depending on your line of work. 16:35:12 all I really know about git is clone and pull. and I also know next to nothing about github 17:45:55 What's going on when, from time to time, I have to restart X because any attempt to launch an application returns "Invalid MIT-MAGIC-COOKIE-1 key" ? 18:57:51 sounds like one of the tmp files in /tmp/.X11-unix/ was deleted 18:58:36 or i would start by checking there 18:58:46 Ltning: ^ 18:59:17 Nope, they're there 18:59:53 and xauth extract - $DISPLAY gives the same value as exists in .Xauthority and /var/run/xdg//lyxauth (which is the global XAUTHORITY path)