04:16:40 <bsdbandit01_> good morning everyone
04:21:04 <angry_vincent> Hi.
05:02:29 <rtprio> EHLO
05:50:47 <kenrap> Man, how the heck I'm supposed to use emulators/wine:amd64 if I can't build my own emulators/wine:i386 since the latter is borked?
05:55:31 <kenrap> Ah, `wine64` itself runs fine. Stupid me with my rubber duck debugging.
05:56:12 <RhodiumToad> you're never alone with a rubber duck
06:04:57 <kenrap> I'm just glad I can run the 64 bit wine separately
07:39:58 <spine-o-saurus> hay what is the util to setup the tty console font again?
07:42:03 <RhodiumToad> vidcontrol
08:10:50 <yuripv> vidfont if you want the "ui"
08:15:15 <RhodiumToad> allscreens_flags in /etc/rc.conf if you want it set on multiuser boot
08:17:25 <spine-o-saurus> RhodiumToad: is that for the name of the font under /usr/share/vt/fonts ?
08:20:39 <RhodiumToad> allscreens_flags="-f blah blah"
08:20:55 <RhodiumToad> i.e. it invokes vidcontrol $allscreens_flags  on each ttyvN device
08:36:58 <spine-o-saurus> what does it mean when i try to chsh -s /usr/local/bin/someshell but it says non-standard shell
08:39:26 <RhodiumToad> it's not listed in /etc/shells
08:40:18 <RhodiumToad> non-root users can't set a non-standard shell
09:28:13 <bsdbandit01_> good morning im trying to change the console colors during freebsd boot when running version 12 i could recompile the kernel by add the following: options      options SC_PIXEL_MODE options VESA options SC_NORM_ATTR=(FG_WHITE|BG_BLACK)
09:28:13 <bsdbandit01_> options SC_KERNEL_CONS_ATTR=(FG_WHITE|BG_RED) i have since upgraded to Freebsd 13.2 my question is how can i change the console colors in freebsd 13.2
09:48:31 <spine-o-saurus> tmux
09:48:52 <spine-o-saurus> lots of colourful customisation available
09:53:49 <angry_vincent> vt colors can be set in /boot/loader.conf
12:02:29 <bsdbandit01_> Hey angry_vincent  does that change the color of text when FreeBSD boots up ?
12:04:01 <Knogle> Hey guys, how are you doing? I am currently runing FreeBSD 13.1 as i want to build OPNsense for the same FreeBSD version as required. Unfortunately, when i install 'pkg' i can only install the newer version for 13.2 (11.9), not the older one (11.8). Is there a way to get the matching packages for FreeBSD 13.1 instead of fetching the newer ones?
12:04:11 <Knogle> Or maybe some kind of downgrade to pkg 11.8? Thanks in advance!
12:16:21 <dstolfa> 13.1 is EOL
12:16:25 <dstolfa> you should upgrade
12:22:07 <Knogle> Yeah i know, unfortunately for some legacy systems i have to build using FreeBSD 13.1, is there maybe some kind of archive for old package versions?
12:24:20 <dstolfa> Knogle: i'm not sure. you can always use poudriere to build the packages for you, though that might require a lot of compute power depending on what you're building
12:24:51 <dstolfa> but if you plan on running this system for a while longer, then it might be the right approach as i don't anticipate 13.1-RELEASE packages to ever reappear or be updated
12:25:03 <meena> don't we tag the ports tree on every release?
12:25:38 <dstolfa> meena: i think ports tree is tagged, but i'm not sure if pre-built packages are available
12:25:40 <meena> the DVDs contain a load of packages, from when the release was cut (so, full of CVEs by now)
12:27:52 <angry_vincent> bsdbandit01_: yes
12:31:28 <Knogle> Ahhh thanks a lot to both of you! I'm currently building it from  the ports tree for 22.7
12:32:09 <Knogle> The operation will free 34 MiB.
12:32:11 <Knogle> [1/1] Deinstalling pkg-1.19.2...
12:32:13 <Knogle> [1/1] Deleting files for pkg-1.19.2: 100%
12:32:15 <Knogle> ===>  Installing for pkg-1.18.4
12:32:17 <Knogle> ===>  Checking if pkg is already installed
12:32:19 <Knogle> ===>   Registering installation for pkg-1.18.4
12:32:21 <Knogle> Installing pkg-1.18.4...
12:32:23 <Knogle> it worked, thansk guys!
12:32:24 <V-T60> Hello. mount -t msdosfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt
12:32:25 <V-T60> mount_msdosfs: /dev/da0s1: Invalid argument
12:32:28 <V-T60> why is that so?
12:32:44 <V-T60> i tried /sbin/gpart create -s MBR da0
12:32:59 <V-T60> /sbin/gpart add -t fat32 da0
12:33:02 <V-T60> isn't that correct?
12:33:49 <isley> you would still have to format it, that only creates the partition
12:34:06 <CmdLnKid> fstype /dev/da0s1
12:34:35 <CmdLnKid> without the e
12:34:40 <V-T60> # fstyp /dev/da0s1
12:34:41 <V-T60> fstyp: /dev/da0s1: filesystem not recognized
12:34:52 <V-T60> i only see mkfs.ext{2,3,4}
12:35:45 <V-T60> do i need newfs_msdos?
12:36:11 <CmdLnKid> i believe so
12:36:21 <CmdLnKid> if thats the absolute correct disk
12:36:38 <CmdLnKid> gpart show/list would reveal that for you
12:38:17 <CmdLnKid> been a while since ive been down this route
12:41:21 <V-T60> CmdLnKid: but what is your route?
12:42:12 <CmdLnKid> I use GPT disks now for the longest time and havent created a MBR for the longest time
12:43:14 <CmdLnKid> well besides usb sticks anyway but most of those are other system images that you just dd
12:43:45 <spine-o-saurus> hey i cant login anymore with user account. it was set for another shell but that was uninstalled, now when I try to login it drops back out to login prompt becase the shell is not installed. then when I tried to set the shell via chsh it reports an error: entry inconsistent, pw_copy invalid argument
12:44:13 <CmdLnKid> id have to manually break out a disk and run back through it with my fingers to make the brain remember
12:45:45 <CmdLnKid> spine-o-saurus, pwd_mkdb /etc/master.passwd
12:45:48 <CmdLnKid> then retry
12:46:19 <CmdLnKid> there may be another file you will have to do that for if that doesn't procees
12:46:38 <spine-o-saurus> CmdLnKid: ok thx
12:48:34 <CmdLnKid> that will allow you to edit /etc/master.passwd then run that command to bring the db up-to-date and allow you to login with the changes applied which i feel is your case
12:49:01 <CmdLnKid> after a chsh you will not have to run pwd_mkdb again
12:50:53 <CmdLnKid> -rw-------  1 root  wheel     2527 Sep  1 10:34 /etc/master.passwd
12:50:54 <CmdLnKid> -rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel    40960 Sep  1 10:35 /etc/pwd.db
12:50:54 <CmdLnKid> -rw-------  1 root  wheel    40960 Sep  1 10:35 /etc/spwd.db
12:51:37 <CmdLnKid> those (ls -l /etc/master.passwd /etc/*.db) should most of the time show similiar times that are close
12:55:21 <V-T60> if i want to backup my synapse, postgresql and nginx installation, what is the best filesystem for that?
12:56:00 <V-T60> is msdosfs good enough?
12:56:25 <CmdLnKid> using a dd for the maybe is your best option
12:56:34 <CmdLnKid> s/the/that/
12:57:27 <V-T60> how is that, when i need to copy folder inside /var/lib and the target is an SD card?
12:58:10 <CmdLnKid> zfs is my goto using snapshots
12:58:45 <CmdLnKid> zip,rsync,dd may be your msdosfs goto
12:59:13 <CmdLnKid> gzip,bzip2,xz,tar
12:59:24 <V-T60> oh, good idea
12:59:35 <CmdLnKid> i wouldn't put zfs on a sdcard
13:00:33 <CmdLnKid> simple script to run through cron and create a archive that has a datestamp on it is at least referencable
13:01:12 <V-T60> i'd check hashsums of gzip/bzip2/xz... processed archive and be sure that filesystem type choice didn't spoil anything
13:01:28 <CmdLnKid> DATESTAMP="$(date "+%y%m%d.log.%H")" for instance
13:01:49 <V-T60> all these msdosfs differences between fat12/16/32 and so on really blow mind
13:02:02 <CmdLnKid> yeah yeah i agree
13:02:22 <V-T60> with maximum file size, name
13:02:29 <V-T60> amount of files
13:03:19 <CmdLnKid> yeah and all that ~ stuff
13:03:52 <CmdLnKid> EDIT /EDT SYS$COMMON:[SYSMGR]SYSTARTUP_VMS.COM
13:04:15 <CmdLnKid> oops ignore that. bad paste ... working with opevms on x86 at the moment
13:05:53 <CmdLnKid> recent newb there
13:23:21 <kenrap> fat32 might be good enough. You could also use exfat for the sdcard since that bypasses the max filesize and partition size of fat32. You will need to install sysutils/fusefs-exfat and sysutils/exfat-utils though
14:31:34 <tercaL> I've a FreeBSD box, nginx running as a proxy, forwarding HTTP/HTTPS requests to the nginx instance in the Jail, running on 10.0.0.3 within the OS. So, that means two nginx instances running on the server. I wonder if I could forward the 80/443 port requests DIRECTLY to the nginx in Jail, by using PF.. Any clue?
14:47:48 <V_PauAmma_V> I haven't done it, but a look at pf.conf(5) hints that it may be possible, using a rdr rule for inbound packets and a nat rule for outbound packets.
15:37:44 <mmlj4> tercaL: I don't see why you can't do that. Redirects are trivial with Linux, I'm sure PF ought to be able to handle it
15:47:00 <scoobybejesus> definitely can. i have caddy as a reverse proxy in a jail
15:48:11 <scoobybejesus> rdr pass inet proto tcp from any to any port {80, 443} -> $caddy_ip
19:26:11 <siix_office> if anyone is familiar with microsoft azure desktop clients (onedrive, teams, etc.) i'm having an issue with them... when passing traffic through my freebsd router i cannot sign in to any services. here's my pf ruleset: http://pastie.org/p/2TBsz2kFIf9fzX6MJzMNV2
19:26:12 <VimDiesel> Title: Pastie
19:27:05 <signalblue> siix_office: but other traffic works?
19:27:09 <siix_office> web-based services work fine, all other web traffic seems to be flowing correctly. it's just the sign-in screens that error out when routing traffic through fbsd
19:27:30 <signalblue> interesting
19:27:41 <signalblue> because why would it discriminate traffic like that
19:27:47 <siix_office> right
19:29:28 <siix_office> oddly enough if i skip over the fbsd router straight to the CE router, then sign in, then put the fbsd router back in everything is great until the apps decide they need me to reauth
19:30:31 <signalblue> i'm having the same traffic discrimination problems like this
19:30:46 <siix_office> with azure desktop apps?
19:31:03 <signalblue> no, my issue involves traffic not routing correctly through wireguard.
19:31:46 <siix_office> local traffic or routed traffic?
19:32:21 <signalblue> when my freebsd wireguard server has to communicate with devices that are local to the server, think on the same subnet, the performance is complete garbage.
19:33:09 <siix_office> yeah wg is a pain sometimes to get configured
19:33:13 <signalblue> so if I'm outside the network and use my laptop to connect to the wireguard server, and then start a VNC connection to another workstation, that is at 120-150Kbit/s max
19:33:27 <signalblue> which makes the VNC connection completely unusable as you can imagine.
19:34:49 <signalblue> this is my pf ruleset - http://pastie.org/p/6DDub7HtSdvno6b90KGKUb
19:34:51 <VimDiesel> Title: Pastie
19:41:33 <siix_office> try #wireguard
19:41:59 <signalblue> yes or #networking
19:42:08 <signalblue> will ask when I have more free time