02:24:56 Has Steam been tested with FreeBSD 14-current? I'm having errors preventing it from running, and I'm wondering if there is a problem with my configuration or it's just incompatible with 14. 02:26:10 These are my errors: https://pastebin.com/yjh49Lnd 02:26:12 Title: $ steam-installDownloading Steam...fetch: http://repo.steampowered.com/steam - Pastebin.com 04:47:04 PaddyMac: have you checked out games/linux-steam-utils ? 05:21:32 Where is the charter for the freebsd-doc mailing list? 06:19:15 where can i talk about freebsd dev talk? including kernel and userland apps 06:19:48 here or in #freebsd-dev 06:19:54 ty 06:32:01 jonusenet: also 06:32:02 Title: Discord 06:33:07 – that is, #devguide, with #kernel nearby. 06:35:11 any autofs users around? 06:37:39 i got it working not too long ago 06:38:41 which features are you using? 06:41:25 let me boot that up and see 06:42:37 not much, apparently: "/home auto_home -nobrowse" 06:45:57 I found a fairly nasty bug that happens most obviously if you try and use both -media and -noauto maps 06:50:24 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=272446 06:50:27 Title: 272446 – automount -c clobbers flags of mounted direct map entries 07:53:42 Speaking of autofs, https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/devd-mount/ landed not too long ago. 07:53:43 Title: FreshPorts -- sysutils/devd-mount: Automount tool utilizing devd notifications 07:54:15 I'm only using autofs for /net so I don't suspect I can be a lot of help. 11:30:19 where is libclang.so on freeBSD? 11:30:48 Somewhere in /usr/lib*? 11:31:23 for the base system? I don't think there is one 11:31:43 applications that use libclang need to use one of the llvm ports 11:33:08 Sorry. As RhodiumToad mentioned, for llvm15 found in /usr/local/llvm15/lib 11:34:46 (applications have to link to a specific llvm version because they're not generally compatible) 11:39:52 RhodiumToad: so I _need_ to get libclang from ports? 11:40:23 if you're building an application that needs libclang, then yes, you need to install one of the devel/llvm* ports 11:41:13 llvm in the base system isn't the complete llvm collection, it's basically just enough for the base system 11:41:36 there are good reasons for this (though right now they escape me) 11:42:01 Is it not possible to build whole & everything llvm+clang by twiddling some knobs? 11:42:05 the main reason is to not make the llvm ABI part of the base system ABI 11:42:27 parv: that's what the ports are for 11:42:27 base clang/llvm is stripped of everything non essential for a compiler, because if it wasn't, we'd have to think about ABI compatibility 11:42:45 * debdrup nods at RhodiumToad and meena 11:43:19 i seem to recall a few other reasons, but they're "minor" reasons compared to that major one 11:53:07 rtprio Yes. That is what's failing to start. As t turns out, I emailed the maintainer last night. I had a reply this morning saying that a fix is in the repo and should y in ports in a couple of weeks. So it's a known issue. 13:32:28 AllanJude: hi, do you know if user vdev properties on FreeBSD are not settable (returning EROFS) by choice, or is it a bug? 14:00:53 yuripv, how are you trying to set these ? 14:01:46 assuming via zfs set ... 14:02:08 no, using zpool set, of course 14:02:25 one of the two ;-) 14:02:51 e.g. zpool set com.example:spare=foo data nda1p1 14:03:01 k 14:03:09 ioctl(4,0xc0185a56 { IORW 0x5a('Z'), 86, 24 },0xeef7c98f928) ERR#30 'Read-only file system' 14:03:15 it shouldn't be :) 14:03:24 interesting 14:04:37 have you also tried setting debugflags=16 "allow shooting yourself in the foot mode", have plenty of backups just in case 14:04:42 pre-defined properties (e.g. zpool set comment=foo pool vdev) are ok, it's only the problem with user properties 14:05:20 that sysctl is completely unrelated, this is zfs thing and properties are stored in per-vdev zaps 14:05:54 i was just too lazy to look in the code and thought a quick answer would do :D 14:05:54 yeah was thinking maybe it had something to do with it being a raw vdev 14:06:32 maybe detach the vdev first ? then set ? 14:06:45 it's not how it works... 14:06:52 i know i know shouldn't be that way 14:07:20 just making a few initial guesess 14:07:23 you can't set properties on something that does not exist :) 14:08:09 as i said, predefined properties are ok, the problem is only with user-defined properties, so anything outside of this scope is unrelated 14:08:23 k