01:13:54 do you use bs=2M or 1M for dd reformatting usb flash sticks? 01:57:14 polyex, I think both/either of 2M or 1M are both larger than the NAND flash stripe size and also a multiple. Meaning that either is okay. 01:57:58 I most often use 1M when I am writing NAND flash these days. 02:37:00 hi 02:37:32 Wait so FreeBSD 4.4 changed the functionality of `install` to `cp` not `mv`? =( 02:45:33 hi. yes. 02:45:39 FreeBSD 13 removed CU-SeeMe, this thing right? - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CU-SeeMe 02:45:40 Title: CU-SeeMe - Wikipedia 02:47:01 haven't heard of that software in like 15 years 02:47:40 How else will I make my point-to-point 4-bit grayscale videocalls? 02:48:29 not as much of a need these days 06:40:23 I'm wondering if any of you folks have an example of a pf rule that would block traffic rom a jail to the rest of the LAN while allowing it to still reach the internet (e.g. any traffic from the bridge interface) 09:11:06 Hi all, is there a "smarter" `pkg clean` that would remove all but the N last packages? (a bit à la https://man.archlinux.org/man/paccache.8) 12:35:08 SamuuelMa: mv is cp + rm 12:37:05 err, wait - that's if it's crosses filesystem boundaries. 15:29:13 When a setup.cfg contains, coverage[toml]>=6.5.0, is this the right DEPENDS line? ${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}coverage>6.5.0:devel/py-coverage@${PY_FLAVOR} 15:47:23 hello bsd folks. I have a pf problem if anyone would care to indulge? 15:52:23 just ask 15:53:22 Hrm. Anyone else have python39 installed via ports and getting hundreds (maybe thousands?) of checksum mismatches in their periodic daily reports? 15:53:41 I'm seeing this on multiple FBSD 13.1 systems. 15:58:44 paulf, it's double nat. my pf drops everything by default and no rules want to play nice with the port I'm trying to allow through 15:59:07 the upstream router works just fine, just not my router :( 16:10:25 ek, I had something happen a week or two ago that sounds like what you describe, although for me it was using pkg. Solved with "pkg update -f" followed by "pkg upgrade", IIRC. 16:11:56 V_PauAmma_V: Hrm. I tried rebuilding all the ports that are reporting the bad checksums. Everything rebuilt fine. However, immediately running another "pkg check" there are still a bunch of mismatched checksums. Not sure what's going on. 16:15:50 Long shot maybe, but do you also have another python 3.x installed? 16:39:34 V_PauAmma_V: it's the bytecode stuff that got reverted because someone got overzealous 16:39:39 ek: too 16:40:22 V_PauAmma_V: Naw. Just the python39 installed at the moment. 16:40:24 and this is why i'm not committing anything to the repositories for the foreseeable future 16:40:32 vishwin: Related to the github fiasco? 16:40:35 no 16:41:03 vishwin: Ah. I wasn't aware of such an issue. 16:41:55 the checksum mismatches with CPython bytecode files are from python packages still using direct setup.py invocations packaging bytecode, but then the (now reverted) trigger compiling them after install 16:42:01 they are harmless 16:42:18 i would direct you to the UPDATING entry but that got swept up as well 16:45:09 combined with nobody, including docs people, actually reading their own shit, is why we can't have nice things...ever... 16:51:28 vishwin: Oh! That makes perfect sense. Exactly what I'm seeing. Thanks! 16:52:51 yeah CPython bytecode isn't meant to be packaged, they're always supposed to be compiled on the target if desired 16:52:57 The periodic daily reports are so large that sendmail hadsa problem delivering them. 16:53:20 s/hadsa/has a/ 16:54:08 i wanted to bundle the bytecode compilation for those cases into an overhaul of that "subsystem" to reduce PORTREVISION, but that obviously got derailed 16:54:15 s/PORTREVISION/PORTREVISION bumps/ 16:57:57 Am I right when I say there is no way to change vt resolution without a KMS driver? 17:03:22 It's not really dependent on the KMS driver. 17:03:47 If you have UEFI with GOP and set it via the loader, the mode shouldn't change once you've set it. 17:07:22 debdrup there is no such rule. 17:07:30 prahou that is true. 17:07:36 Maybe I've just been lucky then.- 17:07:40 no UEFI here 17:07:42 thanks tsoome 17:08:05 prahou: if you do n't have UEFI, vidcontrol(1) can change sc(4) 17:08:22 but I don't want sc 17:08:32 I need unicode fonts 17:08:37 the problem is, some systems limit screen resolution, and you may want to get better ... 17:09:48 just making sure I didn't miss anything, thanks folks 17:10:05 prahou: where've you found a system produced in the last decade that doesn't have UEFI? :P 17:10:06 for example, my system (supermicro X10SAE) does only set 800x600, but the card can do up to 1600x1400. And BIOS mode goes happily with it. 800x600 is rather ugly on this 4k monitor:D 17:10:43 debdrup: who said anything about the last decade? ;) 17:13:02 vt has mechanism to have KMS backed gfx driver doing the draw 17:13:37 I have not checked what is needed to get the actual resolution change happening. 17:14:41 It works well here with the KMS driver (the resolution changes anyway), but it borks acpi suspend, which I couldn't resolve, and I tried. 17:21:09 prahou: really? What breaks ACPI S3 here is the TPM- 17:54:06 debdrup: it's a trial and error endeavor. but I can safely say that radeonkms is at least to some extent a culprit 18:31:36 I don't even know where to ask about this, so I'll try here first. 18:31:37 I'm trying to setup two OPNsense VMs (FreeBSD 13) and on one machine (Ubuntu 22.04) it works fine but on another (Ubuntu Studio 22.04) network access is not working. 18:31:37 I have pretty much identical network setups on both hosts (netplan, both laid out the same) 18:31:37 On the machine that it's not working on I have 4 other VMs (one windows, various linux) and they all work just fine. What could possibly be going on with FreeBSD that it doesn't want to work on this system? 20:48:08 Hi all, anyone have experience with FBSD 13.1 and Samba - Windows 11 22H2 clients - and also, is Samba 4.16 not suitable should I revert to 4.13? 20:55:39 roy2098: Yes 22H2 here. 20:56:58 Hi skered - which Samba version is working, can you provide any info on what you did to get network shares to work? 20:57:29 roy2098: 4.16 and the samething I did with 4.13 and all versions before that. 20:57:55 [name] path = ... 20:58:01 Nothing comples 20:58:04 complex even 20:58:33 did you make any changes to local security policies? 20:58:53 Just security = user 20:59:03 skered: also, which version FBSD? 20:59:04 and map to guest = Bad User 20:59:14 13.1 amd64 21:00:14 skered that's my environment - only twist is Samba is virtualized in one case under bhyve and another case under VirtualBox 21:00:39 * skered smells a firewall or NATing 21:01:25 skered: and that brings another issue - I wonder if there's a bug in the igb interface in FBSD 13.1 21:01:39 skered: i've already got too many variables 21:02:19 skered: what set this off is need to upgrade a working Samba 4.4 I think it was under FBSD 10.2 - both guest and hypervisor 21:02:19 maybe. But my issue with VMs network interfaces are mainly speed. 21:02:31 But then I always go paravirt for all of them 21:02:39 skered: I upgraded first the hypervisor(s) no problem 21:02:52 skered: then the fbsd guests 21:03:21 skered on one of the hypervisors, a previously older VirtualBox fbsd guest would not network 21:03:23 Are your issues with direct connections or you expecthing them to show up automagicly in Network? 21:03:46 skered: net use, File Explorer with ip address, nothing works now 21:04:24 skered: ironically, it does work fine under a FBSD 13.0 release (both hypervisor and guest) 21:04:57 skered - paravirt didn't help at all 21:05:39 skered - apologies I made an error - should be "on one of the hypervisors, a previously older VirtualBox Windows 10 guest would not network 21:07:11 skered - and you may be right about firewall/NAT . These are ubiquiti EdgeRouters and switches and maybe the addresses are stale or something 21:08:34 skered but you are telling me that you have working FBSD v 13.1, Samba 4.16 working with Win11 boxes with latest 22H2 update 21:08:44 skered so that means i have more digging to do 21:09:06 Yeah win11 (all versions), win10, macOS (with fruit/timemachine), and Linux. 21:09:49 skered: did you compile Samba or get from pkg? And any special switches/configs you set? 21:10:04 FreeBSD repos. 21:10:47 skered: not sure what you mean by that exactly... 21:10:52 pkg. 21:11:04 ok. so nothing set other than defaults 21:11:09 Yeah 21:11:20 btw are you using any Samba as domain controller? 21:11:24 Nope 21:11:54 I can only assume this is some type of information leakage attack? Should I unplug my Internet connection? 21:12:15 skered - are you kidding? 21:12:23 skered - why would i attack you? 21:12:25 Aren't we all? 21:12:30 hahaha 21:13:32 look, i appreciate your help; i have to head out now but if it's ok i'll look for you again. Thanks again! 22:04:20 Hi, are there any tools I could use to inspect wired memory? 23:01:52 is there any word when drm-511-kmod will drop? the PRs for 5.11 and 5.12 were merged months ago.