00:12:32 <Axman6> I was asking yesterday about how to deal with a ZFS pool which wasn't using the native ashift - if I could do a zfs send/receive to another drive, and then recreate the pool with the native ashift, would the reverse send/receive be compatible with the new pool, or is the ashift part of the pool itself?
01:44:42 <grahamperrin> parv, chriswells0, rwp: here's a screenshot. Ported htop to the left, patched htop (issue 1039) to the right:
01:44:54 * grahamperrin uploaded an image: (521KiB) < https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/matrix.org/IfWhxRLzrmQRtwkGoyPlXSZe/image.png >
01:47:39 <grahamperrin> I'm inclined to suggest accepting the patched version for release purposes.
02:25:36 <mbnunes> hi good night, somebody use corsair void elite USB ? my freebsd dont find =/
02:26:10 <gman999> tail -f /var/log/messages.. does it show up?
02:26:20 <gman999> or `dmesg` and see
02:45:37 <rennj> see camcontrol, list usb devices
02:45:39 <rennj> # camcontrol devlist
02:45:48 <rennj> https://people.freebsd.org/~rodrigc/doc/handbook/usb-disks.html
02:45:49 <VimDiesel> Title: 18.4.�USB Storage Devices
02:46:20 <rennj> Alternately, usbconfig can be used to list the device.
04:36:14 <rwp> camcontrol requires root, which is fine, but "gpart show" works for non-root enough that I run it after inserting a USB storage device for listing it.
04:57:23 <hd1> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=266644 anyone want to rip me a new one?
04:57:25 <VimDiesel> Title: 266644 – Switch for arbitrary timezone in date(1)
05:02:23 <skered> Why add a non-standard option?  TZ=... date is pretty common.
05:03:58 <hd1> skered: it's shorter to specify "-z"
05:19:28 <rwp> It should be a very high bar to burn a new single letter option.
05:29:50 <parv> hd1, Could you replace "-z" with "-Z" in your patch to reflect "strftime(3)" formats which uses "%Z" for time zone name & "%z" for the offset from UTC?
05:30:44 <parv> Alternatively, I would not mind both options
14:40:46 <dvl> Anyone done lagg with multiple IP addresses? Does one just create lagg0 and lagg1, with one IP address for each or ... something else?
15:16:55 <V_PauAmma_V> I would expect 1 IP address per lagg interface, with disjoint sets of underlying interfaces. But I haven't done it.
17:14:05 <FatalFUUU> If I simply want to install binary packages with pkg, I dont need to select "Ports" during install? as this is for building from source packages?
17:14:30 <Erhard> You can install binary packages without dealing with ports
17:15:34 <FatalFUUU> I was confused why pkg install x... was asking to fetch the package management on the first package
17:16:06 <Erhard> That should just be the binary package manager
17:16:24 <Erhard> It keeps itself updated
17:16:52 <FatalFUUU> Is there a way I can revert what selecting Ports at install has installed?
17:19:08 <yuripv> sounds like `rm -rf /usr/ports` should do it? :)
17:19:57 <FatalFUUU> okay cheers, as simple as that
17:20:47 <FatalFUUU> Used to gentoo, I hear a lot how its similar to BSD ports of course just never really used it other than pfsense/freenas machines.
17:25:21 <FatalFUUU> is install.cfg still a think? I cant find anything in the docs but I find old references online to this (for older versions at least)
17:25:29 <FatalFUUU> s/think/thing/
17:26:44 <yuripv> if the references are really old, something may have changed as sysinstall was replaced with bsdinstall; i don't know anything about install.cfg though, never used it
17:28:42 <FatalFUUU> bsdinstall brings some more results thanks
18:26:03 <Allan> Axman6: send/recv will do the right thing re: ashift
18:26:29 <Allan> dvl: you bind aliases, the same as with a normal interface. you only have a lagg1 if you have different NICs
18:27:39 <dvl> Allan: Thanks, that's what I did. Just like any other NIC. I found https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/lagg-with-alias.7598/
18:27:40 <VimDiesel> Title: LAGG with alias | The FreeBSD Forums
18:28:52 <Allan> yeah
18:29:10 <Allan> ifconfig_lagg0_aliasX="inet 10.x.y.z/32"
18:29:12 <Allan> or whatever
18:29:17 <Allan> in rc.conf to set up as many as you need
18:32:51 <dvl> it's lovely that way
20:29:51 <V_PauAmma_V> ... uh. Riddle me this: without doing silly stuff like deleting the associated host file, and no host disk errors (zpool status or /var/log/messages, how did VirtualBox and FreeBSD 12.3 manage to get a guest disk failure leading to "Periph destroyed" and a ZFS "catastrophic pool I/O failure"?
20:32:11 <mason> V_PauAmma_V: That sounds like it was running. If not I'd think it changed interface types. Might still be a driver issue.
20:33:42 <V_PauAmma_V> It was running, yes. Both the guest disk and the guest itself.
20:42:11 * V_PauAmma_V shrugs and resets that VM. Not much else I can do.
23:02:31 <grahamperrin> V_PauAmma_V: what settings for the guest?
23:03:47 <grahamperrin> Join me in #freebsd-vbox